ACLU and Civil Rights Coalition Welcome Opposition to Alabama’s Anti-Immigrant Law

More Than 90 Advocacy Groups and Countries Filed Briefs BIRMINGHAM, Ala. – The American Civil Liberties Union and a coalition of other civil rights groups welcomed today the filing of legal briefs on behalf of more than 90 advocacy groups and countries opposed to Alabama’s new anti-immigrant law, HB 56. The groups cited the briefs as further evidence of the widespread harm the law will inflict across the state and the growing opposition to HB 56 and similar anti-immigrant measures across the country. Nine amicus curiae briefs were filed last week in the civil rights coalition lawsuit challenging the law. The briefs demonstrate that the Alabama law interferes with U.S. diplomatic interests and encourages discrimination. Civil rights and education groups contend that the law will adversely impact victims of crimes, students with limited English proficiency, Alabama educators and others. The law is set to take effect on September 1. “The outpouring of these briefs shows broad support for the lawsuits challenging this unconstitutional law,” said Cecillia Wang, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. “They condemn the Alabama law because it violates core civil rights and interferes with our government’s ability to protect our national interests on immigration and foreign relations.” The coalition asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama last month to block the law from taking effect. The court has consolidated the coalition’s lawsuit with a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, which accuses the state of undermining federal immigration priorities, and a lawsuit filed by state religious leaders, which alleges the law criminalizes their ability to worship by making it a potential crime to be a good samaritan to an undocumented immigrant. Mary Bauer, SPLC’s legal director, said: “We are pleased to see so many groups voice their opposition to a law that undermines the core American values of fairness and equality. These briefs show this law will wreak havoc across the state and trample the rights of countless residents – regardless of immigration status.” Linton Joaquin, NILC’s general counsel, said: “The diversity of these amici briefs shows the staggering reach of HB 56 and the dire consequences its implementation would have on students, survivors of crime and people of color all across the state.” HB 56 allows law enforcement officials to check individuals’ immigration status, makes it a crime to knowingly transporthouse an undocumented immigrant and requires school officials to determine the immigration status of students and their parents, among other provisions. Click here for a listing of the organizations that filed briefs.

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.