ACLU In Supreme Court Today Arguing Former A.G. Ashcroft Should Be Held Accountable For Wrongful Arrest And Detention Of U.S. Citizen

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2689 or 2666; NEW YORK — The American Civil Liberties Union argued before the United States Supreme Court today that former Attorney General John Ashcroft should be held responsible for the wrongful arrest and detention of a U.S. citizen under the material witness law. The ACLU brought the case against Ashcroft in 2005 on behalf of Abdullah al-Kidd, a U.S. citizen who was improperly arrested and detained in 2003 as a material witness. The ACLU’s lawsuit charges that al-Kidd’s arrest was part of a pattern of pretextual material witness arrests that occurred after September 11, pursuant to a nationwide policy instituted by Ashcroft. “In America, we don’t just arrest people and lock them up without probable cause to believe they violated the law,” said Lee Gelernt, Deputy Director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, who argued the case on behalf of al-Kidd. “The government officials who turned that unlawful practice into official policy — in clear violation of the Constitution — must be held accountable.” The government sought al-Kidd’s arrest as a witness in the case of Sami Al-Hussayen, who had been indicted for visa fraud and making false statements to the government. Al-Kidd was held for 16 days in jails in Virginia, Oklahoma and Idaho, where he was placed in high-security wings with convicted criminals, strip-searched and routinely shackled. He was eventually released from detention, but was placed under onerous conditions that included confining his travel to four states, surrendering his passport and reporting to probation officers. Al-Kidd lived under these conditions for more than a year even though he was never called to testify or charged with a crime. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in September 2009 that the federal material witness statute cannot be used to preventively detain and investigate suspects for whom the government lacks probable cause of wrongdoing. The ruling also held that Ashcroft does not have immunity in the case and can be held personally liable after trial for the wrongful detention of al-Kidd. Ashcroft appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court. “The appeals court made it clear that former Attorney General Ashcroft can be held responsible if he instituted a policy of improperly misusing the material witness statute as a preventive detention tool,” said Steven R. Shapiro, Legal Director of the ACLU. “The appeals court decision was correct and it should be upheld by the Supreme Court.” In addition to Gelernt and Shapiro, attorneys on the case are Lucas Guttentag, Tanaz Moghadam, Michael K.T. Tan and Katherine Desormeau of the ACLU; Lea Cooper of the ACLU of Idaho; Michael J. Wishnie; Cynthia J. Woolley of the Law Offices of Cynthia J. Wolley, PLLC; and R. Keith Roark of the Roark Law Firm, LLP. More information about the case, Ashcroft v. al-Kidd , is available online at:

See the original post here:
ACLU In Supreme Court Today Arguing Former A.G. Ashcroft Should Be Held Accountable For Wrongful Arrest And Detention Of U.S. Citizen

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.