ACLU of Indiana Says FSSA Violating Fourteenth Amendment

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; Indianapolis -A developmentally disabled man whose sister provides his round-the-clock home care may be forced by the state’s social services agency to seek another provider. Kenneth Koslowski of Merrillville, Ind., has a genetic disorder known as phenylketonuria (PKU), which renders him unable to read, write or drive. With an IQ of 35, he requires constant supervision. His sister, Jacqueline Ruark, who is an employee of a national home care agency, has been his primary caregiver for 12 years. On March 1 the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration will implement new rules that “cap” the amount of habilitation services that can be provided by a family member under its Developmental Disabilities Medicaid Waiver Program, effectively rolling back the amount of care Ruark can provide her brother to 40 hours per week. The waiver program allows individuals with disabilities who might otherwise be institutionalized to live at home. FSSA’s new cap will force the siblings to seek an additional caregiver. The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana maintains that the rule violates Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection and due process, as well as the “free choice of provider” provision of the federal Medicaid Act, and is requesting a court order prohibiting the enforcement of the 40-hour cap. “The U.S. Constitution prohibits the state from differentiating between two classes of people, such as patients who happen to be related to their providers and all other patients, without justification,” said ACLU of Indiana staff attorney Gavin M. Rose. “There is no basis for FSSA to place an untenable burden on this brother and sister, whose care-giving arrangements have worked for more than a decade.” Gilbert Holmes, the ACLU of Indiana’s executive director, said FSSA’s new rule is contrary to the whole notion of family values. “Here is a family member taking care of a family member, and the state wants them to pay for someone else to do that job,” said Holmes. “It seems like a dehumanizing and callous approach to addressing the need of a segment of humanity that cannot fend for itself.” The case, Jacqueline Ruark and Kenneth Kozlowski v. Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration was filed in the United States District Court Southern District of Indiana under cause number 1:12-cv-0269-RLY-TAB.

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.