ACLU Tells Court Religious Beliefs Should Not Dictate Insurance Coverage For Reproductive Health Care

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 519-7829 or 549-2666; media@aclu.org RICHMOND – The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Virginia filed a friend-of-the-court brief today opposing faith-based Liberty University’s argument that the health care reform act passed last year would violate its rights by requiring it to purchase insurance that could cover abortion. The ACLU argued that religious beliefs should not dictate access to health care services for others. Liberty University’s argument, put forth in its lawsuit against the government challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA), would effectively require insurance companies to exclude coverage for abortion and other health care services that any faith claims are objectionable. The university lost its initial challenge to the ACA last year and is now appealing the case. “Liberty University’s argument in this case is part of a larger strategy to deny women vital reproductive health care services in their health care coverage,” said Brigitte Amiri, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. “Every woman deserves the peace of mind of knowing that she can make the best decision for her situation without having her medical coverage dictated by someone else’s beliefs.” Women’s access to abortion care and contraception is at the heart of many battles currently being waged in Washington, D.C. and in state legislatures. The House of Representatives is currently considering measures such as a proposal to eliminate funding for family planning programs and legislation that would take away insurance coverage for abortion from the millions of women who currently have it. Many state legislatures are also banning abortion coverage in the health care exchanges that were created by the federal health care reform legislation. “While everyone is free to make their own health care decisions based on their own religious beliefs, those beliefs cannot be used to deny services to others,” said Daniel Mach, Director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “One need only consider the impact of compelling insurance companies to refuse to cover other medical procedures forbidden by various faiths, such as blood transfusions and organ transplants, to see the harmful implications of Liberty’s argument.” “No one is required to undergo treatment that conflicts with her faith,” said Rebecca Glenberg, Legal Director of the ACLU of Virginia. “But abortion is a legal procedure that is already covered by most insurance plans. It is wrong to deny women access for the care they need based on others’ objections.” Today’s brief was filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Lawyers on the case include Amiri and Andrew Beck of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project; Mach and Heather L. Weaver of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief; and Glenberg of the ACLU of Virginia. The ACLU’s amicus brief can be found here: www.aclu.org/religion-belief-reproductive-freedom/liberty-university-v-geithner-brief-amici-curiae

Read more here:
ACLU Tells Court Religious Beliefs Should Not Dictate Insurance Coverage For Reproductive Health Care

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.