ACLU Urges North Carolina Governor to Veto Bill Repealing Historic Racial Justice Act

Law Is Attempt to Ensure No One Is Sent to Death Because of Racial Bias FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; Raleigh, N.C. – The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of North Carolina today urged North Carolina Gov. Beverly Perdue to veto a bill passed earlier this week repealing the state’s historic Racial Justice Act (RJA), which gives prisoners on death row the chance to argue their sentences were the result of racial bias. In a letter to the governor, the ACLU argues the act, passed by the state legislature and signed into law by Perdue in 2009, is essential to ensuring defendants receive the constitutional guarantees of due process and equal protection under the law. The letter also argues there is no chance any current death row prisoner would go free as a result of a successful challenge of their sentence under the law, as state prosecutors have wrongly warned and says there is no evidence to suggest implementation of the law has thus far proved a burden upon the state’s court system. “To abandon the RJA now, before any hearings under the fledgling law can be held would … put North Carolina in danger of executing a person based on race rather than the crime committed,” the ACLU’s letter reads. The RJA allows North Carolina’s 157 death row prisoners a hearing in which they can present statistics and other evidence showing that death sentences, state- and county-wide, were tainted by race discrimination and that their death sentence should be commuted to life in prison without the possibility of parole. State prosecutors in recent weeks have intensified their calls for repeal, unhappy with a recent Michigan State University study showing a significantly higher likelihood that prosecutors in North Carolina would eliminate potential African-American jurors, and that defendants in the state are more than twice as likely to be sentenced to death if the victim is white than if the victim is black. Prosecutors were also unsuccessful this month in an attempt to oust the African-American judge slated to oversee the first hearing held under the law. The ACLU’s letter also debunks an argument put forth by opponents of the RJA that the law violates the ex post facto provision of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits imposing a harsher penalty against an individual than the punishment provided for by statute at the time a crime is committed. “There is no danger either that the RJA violates the Constitution or that death row inmates may be released from prison should they successfully make a claim under the RJA,” the letter reads. A copy of the ACLU’s letter is available online at:

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.