Blogger Defamation Suit Survives Dismissal

As the business of blogging has become an important part of popular media, so has the blogger defamation suit. In one of the newer suits to hit the blogging community, a federal judge has refused to toss out a lawsuit filed by former USDA official Shirley Sherrod against conservative political blogger Andrew Breitbart. He and his employee have been accused of editing video footage of a speech Sherrod gave on racial reconciliation to make it appear as though she was making racist remarks against white farmers. While you may remember last year’s media frenzy, and Sherrod’s eventual forced resignation, the important issue here is that bloggers are not immune to defamation lawsuits. While bloggers are certainly entitled to freedom of expression, like regular citizens and even journalists, they are not entitled to make fraudulent statements about another person or company. Especially if they know that information to be false. Unfortunately, there is often a very fine line between statements that are merely opinion, and thus protected speech, and those false statements that appear to be fact and are thus defamatory. Though no one is suggesting self-censorship, to avoid a blogger defamation suit, it’s important that you step away for a second and ask yourself how a third party might construe your statements given the totality of your post. Is it opinion? Or would a reasonable person think you were stating facts? Sometimes providing a little more footage or information can catapult a post clearly into opinion territory, and far away from a blogger defamation lawsuit. Related Resources: Judge: Sherrod Defamation Suit Against Breitbart Can Proceed (Talking Points Memo) Defamation Law: The Basics (FindLaw) Should Shirley Sherrod Sue Andrew Breitbart and Fox News? (FindLaw’s Writ) Digital Defamation: The Hot New Tort? (FindLaw’s Injured)

Read this article:
Blogger Defamation Suit Survives Dismissal

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.