Booksellers, Artists, ACLU Seek to Bar Utah Law Restricting Speech on Internet

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah—A coalition including booksellers, media companies, artists, and the ACLU of Utah today asked the federal district court in Salt Lake City to permanently bar enforcement of a Utah statute that restricts constitutionally-protected speech on the Internet. Although passed in 2005, the statute has not been in effect because Utah consented to a temporary injunction barring its enforcement. Utah’s law seeks to regulate all Internet speech that some might consider “harmful to minors,” including works of visual art, photography, graphic novels, and information about sexual health and the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. The plaintiffs are represented in Florence v. Shurtleff, No. 05-CV-485 (United States District Court, District of Utah) by Michael Bamberger, a partner of SNR Denton US LLP and general counsel of Media Coalition; Darcy Goddard, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Utah Foundation, Inc.; and John B. Morris, general counsel of the Center for Democracy & Technology. “Utah’s statute, like those invalidated elsewhere, imposes sweeping burdens on constitutionally-protected speech,” said Mr. Bamberger, who has successfully brought suit to invalidate similar statutes in other states, including New Mexico, Arizona, and Massachusetts. “It is simply impossible for every person who makes available on the Internet constitutionally protected information, such as our “Know Your Rights” materials for students and LGBT youth, paintings photographs depicting nudes, to anticipate and monitor every person who might access that information and restrict access to those minors to whom the information might be considered ‘harmful,'” said Ms. Goddard. “There are other options available, such as parental controls, that could accomplish the state’s goal of protecting minors more effectively and within the bounds of the First Amendment.” “The law also harms Utah businesses’ ability to compete with non-Utah companies in the Internet hosting service market,” noted Mr. Morris. “Companies that publish mainstream, First Amendment-protected material may face risk of criminal liability if they use Utah, rather than non-Utah, web hosts.” Copies of the motion for summary judgment and supporting materials can be downloaded here > > Learn more about the case of Florence v. Shurtleff here:

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.