CA Supreme Court Eases Meal Break Rules

California meal break laws just got a whole lot easier for employers to swallow. Up until now, an employer’s meal break obligations were unclear. Are employers required to ensure that employees do no work during their meal breaks? Or can employees choose to work during that time? In the just-issued Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego , the court decided to go with the second option. California meal break laws, specifically Labor Code section 512 and Work Order No. 5, only require employers to provide employees with a 30 minute uninterrupted meal break, according to the court. An employer satisfies this obligation when “it relieves its employees of all duty, relinquishes control over their activities and permits them a reasonable opportunity to take an uninterrupted 30-minute break, and does not impede or discourage them from doing so.” If an employee wants to work through his break , it is his right to do so. However, employers still have an obligation to pay employees should this happen. Employers will be liable only for “straight pay” when they knew, or should have known, the employee worked through lunch. “Straight pay” is the employee’s ordinary wage. It’s therefore important to communicate with your employees about whether or not they are working through meal breaks. While California’s meal break laws allow them to skip lunch, you don’t want to be accused of not paying them for their work. You’ll also want to ensure that the extra 30 minutes does not activate your obligation to pay overtime. Related Resources: California High Court Rules in Lunch-Break Labor Case (Associated Press) Employee Wages for Meal and Rest Breaks (FindLaw) Don’t Get Sued for Not Providing Meal Breaks (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

Go here to see the original:
CA Supreme Court Eases Meal Break Rules

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.