California Department of Corrections Agrees to Amend Policy to Allow Sikh Inmate to Freely Practice His Faith

ACLU Filed Lawsuit on Behalf of Prisoner Unfairly Disciplined for Maintaining His Beard in Compliance with His Beliefs LOS ANGELES – The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) agreed today to amend its grooming policies to allow inmates to maintain beards in accordance with their faith. The decision comes as a response to a lawsuit filed by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Sikh Coalition. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of inmate Sukhjinder S. Basra, who had been punished for refusing to trim his beard on religious grounds. Keeping unshorn hair is one of the central tenets of the Sikh faith. The lawsuit was filed after Basra, an otherwise model inmate, was denied visitation rights and other privileges for not trimming his beard in accordance with the CDCR’s grooming regulation. “The only reason CDCR has ever disciplined Mr. Basra during his two years in prison is because he chose to exercise his constitutional right to follow the dictates of his religion,” said Peter Eliasberg, legal director with the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. “The CDCR has made the right decision to change the regulation so that inmates will not lose their right to practice their faith while they are incarcerated.” In the settlement announced today, CDCR agreed to repeal the restriction prohibiting inmates from growing their facial hair more than a half inch in length. Basra will also have his record cleared of all violations and be permitted to wear a religious head covering. “Mr. Basra was peaceably observing his faith while posing absolutely no threat to the health and safety of the prison population,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “We are glad that the CDCR has recognized the fundamental importance of basic religious exercise, even within the prison walls.” “This victory underscores the bedrock principle of religious freedom upon which this country was founded,” said Harsimran Kaur, legal director of The Sikh Coalition. “The right to practice one’s faith free from government interference applies to everyone, including religious minorities like Sikhs.” Attorneys on the case include Eliasberg, Mach, Kaur and Jonathan M. Gordon, Leib M. Lerner and Cassandra Hooks of Alston & Bird LLP. The complaint can be seen here: www.aclu.org/prisoners-rights-religion-belief/basra-vs-cate-complaint

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.