Court Blocks Implementation of Discriminatory Anti-Immigrant Law in Indiana

Law is Third of its Kind to be Blocked by Federal Courts INDIANAPOLIS – A federal judge today blocked the implementation of a discriminatory Indiana law inspired by Arizona’s notorious SB 1070. The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center filed the lawsuit last month charging that the law authorizes police to make warrantless arrests of individuals based on assumed immigration status and criminalizes the use acceptance of the commonly used consular ID card. The groups also charged in their lawsuit that the law will lead to racial profiling and trample upon the rights of all Indiana residents. Judges in Arizona and Utah have blocked the implementation of similar anti-immigrant laws in those states, and the ACLU, NILC and others earlier this month filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against a similar anti-immigrant law in Georgia. The ACLU, NILC and Southern Poverty Law Center have also publicly announced plans to legally challenge the draconian anti-immigrant law passed June 3 in Alabama. The following can be attributed to: Ken Falk, legal director of the ACLU of Indiana: “We are very gratified that the Court has restrained Indiana from entering the immigration field and has prevented Indiana residents from being threatened with arrest and fines for no valid reason.” Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project: “We are pleased the court has blocked this discriminatory law from taking effect. Wherever civil liberties are threatened, be it in Utah, Arizona, Indiana elsewhere, we will continue to challenge unconstitutional laws like these.” Shiu-Ming Cheer, staff attorney with NILC: “Today’s decision will prevent countless Indianans of color from suffering unnecessary and unconstitutional rights violations simply because their legislators passed a draconian law. We are pleased that the Court has prevented the most pernicious and discriminatory elements of this law from going into effect, and we look forward to the day that it is permanently removed from Indiana’s lawbooks.”

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.