Court Prohibits Religious Restrictions on Government-Funded Trafficking Victims’ Program

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; BOSTON – A federal judge ruled late yesterday that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) cannot impose religiously based restrictions on reproductive health services for victims of human trafficking. The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Massachusetts challenged HHS’ distribution of funds connected to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) because the organization prohibited these funds from being used to pay for contraceptive and abortion referrals and services. Until recently, USCCB subcontracted with organizations that aided trafficking victims, but banned them from using any federal funds to provide or refer for contraception, condoms and abortion care. Since many trafficking victims have been raped by the traffickers and forced into prostitution, these services are vital. “The court is right to insist that organizations receiving government funding cannot use their religion as an excuse to discriminate and withhold crucial services from victims of human trafficking,” said Brigitte Amiri, senior staff attorney with the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project. “The court’s decision ensures that people who have been forced into horrific circumstances will have access to all necessary services – including reproductive health care – to rebuild their lives.” The federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act funds an array of services for thousands of persons brought into the United States annually, often being forced into the commercial sex trade. Many suffer extreme violence and sexual assault at the hands of traffickers, and risk contracting HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. “Federal law calls for a full range of health care to be provided to the victims of human trafficking,” said Sarah Wunsch, staff attorney with the ACLU of Massachusetts. “While the Catholic Bishops are entitled to their beliefs, freedom of religion does not mean the Bishops get to impose their doctrines on others with the use of taxpayer dollars.” In his ruling, Judge Richard G. Stearns stated: “”To insist that the government respect the separation of church and state is not to discriminate against religion; indeed, it promotes a respect for religion by refusing to single out any creed for official favor at the expense of all others.” “This case is about the limits of the government’s ability to delegate to a religious institution the right to use taxpayer money to impose its beliefs on others (who may or may not share them).” Although HHS did not renew USCCB’s contract this year, the ACLU continued with the case to ensure that taxpayer dollars are not misused to impose religious restrictions on vulnerable trafficking victims that receive U.S. aid. More information on this case can be found at:…

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.