Court Upholds Right of Blogger to Remain Anonymous, Criticize Warren Officials

DETROIT – In a victory for free speech, a Macomb County Court upheld the right of a blogger to remain anonymous and criticize the City of Warren’s assistant attorney. The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan is representing a blogger who was targeted in a defamation lawsuit by the city attorney demanding that he reveal his identity after posting unfavorable remarks to a message board dedicated to the discussion of local public affairs. “Keeping in line with a rich history of court decisions upholding anonymous political speech, the judge today rejected the assistant attorney’s attempts to bully members of the public into silence,” said Bill Burdett, ACLU of Michigan cooperating attorney of the law firm Boyle Burdett. “The decision sends a clear message to our elected and appointed officials that they cannot use lawsuits to silence public criticism.” In February 2011, the blogger posted an article on the message board www.warrenforum.net questioning the legitimacy of Assistant City Attorney Ronald Papandrea’s bankruptcy filings. The blogger’s post alleged that the Papandrea had arranged to retire, file for bankruptcy and then be rehired after his debts were discharged. Soon after the article and link were posted, Papandrea subpoenaed the Internet service provider for information that would reveal the identity of the blogger. The ACLU represented the blogger in asking Circuit Judge Diane Druzinski to quash the subpoena and dismiss the case on First Amendment grounds. In an April 2011 article published in The Macomb Daily, Papandrea acknowledges that his intention for filing the lawsuit is to censor critics on the message board. He is quoted as saying, “I think the web site has an undue influence on Warren politics – a bad influence. . . . If I can expose it for what it is, people are going to have to debate the real issues. Politicians in this city live in fear of this web site and it affects what they do.” On Friday, attorneys for Papandrea dismissed the defamation case voluntarily after Judge Druzinski quashed the subpoena. “Free speech is the bedrock of our Constitution and our democracy,” said Burdett. “Since the founding of our nation, anonymous speech has played a significant role in politics. In fact, the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the Constitution, were written anonymously by our founding fathers.” For years, the ACLU of Michigan has worked with policy makers to pass laws protecting against lawsuits intended to censor protected speech by burdening speakers with the costs of defending themselves against frivolous claims. Approximately half the states in our country have laws protecting citizens who speak out on matters of public concern from “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” (SLAPP), however, anti-SLAPP bills introduced in Michigan have not received a legislative hearing. In addition to Burdett, the blogger is represented by Dan Korobkin, ACLU of Michigan staff attorney. To read the opinion quashing the subpoena, go to: http://www.aclumich.org/sites/default/files/file/papandreaorderquashings… To read the ACLU’s motion for Summary Disposition, go to: http://www.aclumich.org/sites/default/files/file/papandreamotionsummaryd…

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.