Does ‘Footzyrolls’ Infringe on ‘Tootsie Roll’?

Would you be inclined to confuse Footzyrolls with Tootsie Rolls? For the uninitiated, Footzyrolls are shoes that roll into small bundles so they can easily be stored in a woman’s purse. Produced by Rollashoe, a sister-owned small business, the shoes are part of a line that includes Footzysocks and Footzyfolds. In a bid to protect its brand, Tootsie Roll has filed suit against Rollashoe’s Footzyrolls. The company alleges that the names are so similar that the shoes are likely to cause consumer confusion and dilute the Tootsie Roll trademark. Even if you think this is a frivolous suit (a shoe maker and a candy maker?), such lawsuits are not at all uncommon. In fact, Chick-fil-A, which owns the trademark to the phrase “eat mor chikin,” has recently taken action against an artist who urges people to ” eat more kale. ” Though assertions of consumer confusion may be a bit unfounded, Tootsie Roll and Chik-fil-A still have a chance of prevailing in court. It’s called trademark dilution. Holders of famous trademarks can argue that a similar mark dilutes their mark’s uniqueness. If others use a similar mark to sell a product–regardless of product relatedness–consumers are less likely to associate the famous mark with the proper product. Unfortunately for small businesses, a number of courts have found that the two marks don’t have to be substantially similar to win a claim. This increases the risk of lawsuit exponentially. So before you employ a slogan, logo, company or product name, you’re going to have to consider that risk. Are you willing to fight your own Footzyroll battle? Or should you just choose something else? Related Resources: Tootsie Roll Suing Footzyrolls Over Trademark (Techdirt) North Face vs. South Butt: Is this the Start of a TM War? (FindLaw’s Legally Weird) Facebook Vanity URLs and Trademarks (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

The rest is here:
Does ‘Footzyrolls’ Infringe on ‘Tootsie Roll’?

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.