‘Dwarf Barista’ Settles Lawsuit with Starbucks

Nicknamed the “dwarf barista,” Elsa Sallard of El Paso, Texas has reached a settlement with Starbucks over a disability discrimination lawsuit brought on her behalf by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Born with dwarfism, a local Starbucks fired Sallard after she requested a stool to compensate for her small stature–a reasonable accommodation under the American with Disabilities Act. Starbucks has agreed to pay Sallard $75,000 , be subject to a federal consent decree for 2 years, and will train its area managers in how to accommodate individuals with disabilities. While the settlement monies would certainly be a hefty amount for any small business, consider the implications of being subject to a discrimination consent decree. A consent decree is a voluntary settlement that has been transformed into a judicial order. This allows the court to maintain jurisdiction over the case for the duration of the decree in order to ensure that the parties comply. Depending on the severity of the infraction, an EEOC consent decree can last for multiple years. They often require an employer to do the following: Refrain from discriminating Make efforts to diversify the workforce Retrain management and employees Keep records for a designated time period Report that information to the EEOC There are consequences–often fines–for failing to comply. As is likely to occur with the dwarf barista lawsuit, a business subject to a consent decree spends more time and money complying with its terms than it saved by not complying with the law, proving that discrimination can be very costly. Related Resources: Former El Paso Barista Awarded $75,000 In Starbucks Lawsuit (KFOX-TV) Employment Discrimination: Overview (FindLaw) Starbucks Sued by EEOC for Firing Dwarf (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

Read more here:
‘Dwarf Barista’ Settles Lawsuit with Starbucks

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.