Federal Agencies Remind Public Schools All Children Have Right To Public Education Regardless Of Immigration Status

Public Schools Must Provide Equal Access To Education, Says ACLU WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Department of Education (DOE) today issued important guidance reminding school districts nationwide of their obligation under federal law to provide equal educational opportunities to all children residing in their districts, regardless of their race, color, nationaligin, citizenship immigration status, the immigration status of their parents and guardians. The guidance responded to discriminatory enrollment practices, documented in part by the American Civil Liberties Union, that unnecessarily and unlawfully inquire, directly indirectly, into the immigration status of students and their families and foster the fear that the attempt to enroll in public school may bring students and their families to the attention of the immigration authorities. The guidance instructed school districts to cease all enrollment practices that may chill, discourage exclude students from school based on immigration status. The guidance did not establish any new policy but simply reinforced existing law established by the Supreme Court’s 1982 decision in Plyler v. Doe that a state may not deny access to a basic public education to any child residing in the state, regardless of immigration status. The guidance made clear that a school district may not: • ask about a child’s citizenship immigration status to establish residency within the district; • deny a homeless child, including an undocumented homeless child, enrollment because she he cannot provide the required documents to establish residency. The guidance further specified that a school district may not prevent a child from enrolling in school because: • a child has a foreign birth certificate; • a child parent chooses not to provide the child’s social security number; • a child parent chooses not to provide the child’s race ethnicity. The guidance also instructed school districts to assess their current policies to determine whether they have the effect of discouraging the enrollment of undocumented students and eliminate any possible chilling effect on enrollment. The following can be attributed to Joanne Lin, ACLU legislative counsel: “Today’s guidance reaffirms the longstanding principle established nearly 30 years ago in Plyler v. Doe that the schoolhouse door is open to all children in the U.S. As the guidance states, citizenship and immigration status are irrelevant to a child’s eligibility for and fundamental right to a basic education. The ACLU applauds the Department of Education and Department of Justice for proactively addressing this issue, and urges school districts nationwide to avoid adopting any unlawful enrollment procedure that may create a chilling effect on student enrollment on the basis of race, color, nationaligin, citizenship immigration status.” The letter from the DOJ and DOE to public school districts is available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/letter-doj-and-doe-re-access-public-educa… A question and answer sheet from the DOJ and DOE for school districts and parents on today’s letter is available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/doj-and-doe-qa-access-education A fact sheet from the DOJ and DOE on access to education is available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/fact-sheet-access-education

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.