Fired for Marijuana: Employer Drug Policy Trumps

Add employers in the state of Washington to those who may legally fire medical marijuana users . On Thursday, the Washington Supreme Court released a decision in which it severely curtailed the rights of medical marijuana patients in the workplace. Not only may they be fired, but the decision also bars the state Human Rights Commission from investigating complaints, leaving employers with little liability under anti-discrimination laws. Though many states with medical marijuana laws allow employers to fire medical marijuana users for on-the-job impairment, there are a lot of lingering questions about whether an employee can be fired after failing a drug test if he legally uses medicinal pot. For one, under state law, its use is a form of medical treatment, and the employee may be considered disabled for the purposes of discrimination law. And for two, its use is not technically a state crime. Washington’s high court didn’t buy either of these arguments. It concluded that, regardless of voter intent, it would be contrary to public policy to force employers to sanction criminal activity, as medical marijuana is still a federal crime. Additionally, it found that, because it is a crime, medical marijuana use can’t form the basis for a reasonable accommodation claim, which leaves the state without authority to investigate employment discrimination claims relating to medical marijuana. Though the court did say there may be a potential civil claim for wrongful discharge against employers who fire medical marijuana users, this decision essentially dictates that employer drug policies trump Washington’s medical marijuana law. Related Resources: WA court: Workers can be fired over medical pot (Associated Press) Walmart Can Fire Medical Marijuana Users (FindLaw’s Law & Daily Life) Medical Marijuana Users Still Can Be Fired (FindLaw’s Chicago Employment Law Blog)

View original post here:
Fired for Marijuana: Employer Drug Policy Trumps

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.