Florida Ballot Initiative Will Strip Away Religious Liberty, Says ACLU

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Florida joined other civil liberties, religious and educationanizations in filing a lawsuit today challenging the ballot language of a proposed Florida amendment that would eliminate Florida’s ban on taxpayer funding of religiousanizations and create a virtual requirement that public funds be used to support religious institutions. “Lawmakers fabricated Florida history and deceived their colleagues to get this misleading proposal before the public,” said Howard Simon, executive director of the ACLU of Florida. Earlier this month, the ACLU issued a report refuting the erroneous argument from the amendment’s supporters that the longstanding ban is rooted in anti-Catholic bias. “It’s clear what they really want is to force taxpayers to support churches, mosques and synagogues and re-fight Florida’s voucher wars,” Simon said. “They should have just taken those radical ideas to the public instead of disguising them in this inaccurate, misleading and phony notion of ‘religious freedom’ when what they really want is to take away your freedom to support the religion of your choicenone at all.” “The ballot language is written to fool Floridians into approving a measure that actually strips away religious liberty protections,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “Florida voters have a right to know what this proposal would really mean: abandoning over 100 years of constitutional safeguards and opening the door to taxpayer funded religious discrimination and indoctrination.” More information on this lawsuit can be found at: www.aclu.org/religion-belief/rabbi-merrill-shapiro-et-al-v-kurt-browning

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.