House Committee Passes Unconstitutional Secure Visas Act

Eliminates Judicial Review of Decisions to Revoke Visas of Immigrants WASHINGTON – The House Judiciary Committee today passed the Secure Visas Act. The bill (H.R.1741), introduced last month by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), would unconstitutionally eliminate judicial review of executive branch decisions to revoke visas, running contrary to clear Supreme Court precedent and Congress’ own legislation enacted in 2004. A similar bill eliminating judicial review has also been introduced in the Senate. Though the bill’s purported aim is protecting national security, the Secure Visas Act affects a much wider range of people than those who are targeted for security reasons. Without judicial review, people admitted to the U.S. as permanent residents those with valued skills – investors, physicians engineers, for example – could have their visas abruptly revoked by the government and face many permanent consequences including deportation, separation from U.S. citizen family members, termination of employment and severing of investment and other financial ties to the U.S. With so much at stake, it is imperative to retain judicial review for those placed in deportation proceedings on account of visa revocation to protect against mistakes violations made by government authorities. The following can be attributed to Joanne Lin, legislative counsel with the ACLU Washington Legislative Office: “Judicial review is imperative to protect the due process rights of people who have done nothing to warrant visa revocation and permanent deportation. Judicial review is also a check on executive authority to revoke visas in a discriminatory manner. Without the safeguard of a review process, people this country once welcomed onto its shores because of their talents and skills could face permanent separation from the U.S. and all they have built here. The American Civil Liberties Union strongly opposes the Secure Visas Act, which violates constitutional protections of due process for everyone in America.” A letter from the ACLU to the House Judiciary Committee opposing the Secure Visas Act is available at: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/aclu-letter-house-judiciary-committee-opp…

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.