Missouri Ballot Initiative on Religion Amendment is Misleading, Says ACLU

Description of Ballot Measure Fails to Mention Amendment Would Revoke Fundamental Rights JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – The American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Eastern Missouri and the ACLU of Kansas and Western Missouri filed today a lawsuit challenging the misleading description of a constitutional amendment that will be put to a vote in November 2012 and which would deny religious protections to prisoners and would allow students to refuse to participate in any assignment that they claim violates their religious beliefs. “The people of Missouri have a right to know exactly what they’re voting for,” said Anthony Rothert, legal director of the ACLU of Eastern Missouri. “The disingenuous way this amendment is described on the ballot is clearly meant to persuade the voters to approve it without knowing what it really says.” The description of the amendment on the ballot states that the amendment will ensure that the right of Missouri citizens to express their religious beliefs shall not be infringed, that school children have the right to pray and acknowledge God voluntarily in their schools and that all public schools will be required to display the Bill of Rights. It does not mention provisions in the amendment’s text that would “remove any state constitutional protection of religious expressionliberty for prisoners in statelocal custody” and require that “no student shall be compelled to performparticipate in academic assignmentseducational presentations that violate hisher religious beliefs.” “It is extremely concerning that the summary of the amendment would fail to warn voters that religious freedoms would actually be denied to a significant number of people and leaves out components that would make many voters pause before approving,” said Doug Bonney, legal director of the ACLU of Kansas and Western Missouri. The lawsuit is being filed on behalf of two plaintiffs – a minister in the United Methodist Church who is a spiritual advisor to inmates in the Missouri Department of Corrections and an associate professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. The plaintiffs are concerned that voters will not realize that the amendment will take away the rights of prisoners to practice their faith while incarcerated, and may compromise the education of students who opt out of assignments by depriving them of the opportunity to learn about cultures and concepts that they may personally disagree with, but are necessary to know about as part of a comprehensive, quality education. “Both the Missouri and federal Constitutions already protect the fundamental right of religious expression,” said Daniel Mach, director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “What voters may not realize when approving this amendment is that it would actually strip away existing rights.” Lawyers on the case include Rothert and Grant Doty of the ACLU of Eastern Missouri, Bonney of the ACLU of Kansas and Western Missouri and Mach of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. The petition can be seen at: www.aclu.org/religion-belief/coburn-v-mayer-petition

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.