NORML.ORG – Michigan: Kalamazoo Voters To Decide On Marijuana ‘Deprioritization’ Measure

Kalamazoo, MI: Kalamazoo voters will decide this November on a municipal initiative that seeks to make marijuana law enforcement the city’s “lowest priority.” The proposed amendment to Kalamazoo’s city charter seeks to make the possession of an ounce or less of marijuana by adults age 21 the city’s lowest law enforcement priority. The initiative is modeled after a similar measure that was enacted by Seattle voters in 2003. A review of that measure in 2008 reported that implementation of the ordinance was associated with a reduction in local law enforcement costs and “no evident increase in marijuana use among youth and young adults.” Voters in Tacoma, Washington will also vote on a similar proposal this fall. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and Attorney General Bill Schuette have spoken out against the measure. Separate ‘deprioritization’ measures have previously been approved by voters nationwide, including voters in Oakland , California and Denver , Colorado. Since 1972, the city of Ann Arbor, Michigan has imposed a local ordinance classifying minor marijuana possession as a civil infraction rather than a criminal misdemeanor, as is called for under state law . In 2008, 63 percent of Michigan voters approved Proposal 1, which legalized the limited use and cultivation of cannabis by patients who possess a physician’s recommendation. For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, at (202) 483-5500.

NORML.ORG – Michigan: Kalamazoo Voters To Decide On Marijuana ‘Deprioritization’ Measure

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.