Planned Parenthood and ACLU Win Temporary Suspension of Indiana Law that Would Defund Family Planning Programs

Judge’s Ruling Comes Just as Funding Was Set to Expire INDIANAPOLIS – A federal judge granted a request by Planned Parenthood of Indiana (PPIN) to temporarily halt the enforcement of a recently passed state law that strips theganization of Medicaid funding. U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt’s decision means that PPIN can once again be reimbursed for the preventive health care it provides its 9,300 Medicaid patients. PPIN is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, the ACLU and Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA). The judge found that there was merit to PPIN’s claim that the new law violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law. She ruled that the Medicaid defunding portion of the law should not be enforced during this interim period before a permanent injunction hearing takes place, likely before the year is out. “This decision will have immediate, positive consequences for our patients and ourganization, the state’s largest reproductive health care provider,” said PPIN President and CEO Betty Cockrum. “We’ve been caring for our established Medicaid patients through donations, which were set to run out June 20. This ruling means we can continue providing Pap tests, breast exams, STD testing and treatment and birth control to both existing and new Medicaid patients. It also means that we have avoided the difficult decision to close health centers and lay off staff members while the permanent injunction we are seeking is pending.” “This is a positive first step in what promises to be a long legal battle,” said Ken Falk, legal director of the ACLU of Indiana and lead counsel in the case. “We are encouraged by the judge’s ruling but know we have a very long way to go before we can ultimately declare victory.” PPIN also contended that the law would force health care professionals to make statements about the beginning of life that are not medically and scientifically sound, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Judge Pratt ruled that this portion of the law will not go into effect July 1. More information on this case can be found at:…

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.