Retailers Sue Federal Reserve Over Swipe Fees

Retailers have filed a new swipe fee lawsuit against the Federal Reserve, arguing that the cap took into account bank expenses that could not be considered under the law. The retailers’ suit comes after the Federal Reserve capped swipe fees at 21 cents earlier this year. The central bank originally proposed swipe fees should be capped at 12 cents before changing their mind. Swipe fees averaged at 44 cents per transaction before the Federal Reserve’s new rules. The swipe fee lawsuit alleges that merchants will be harmed by the new rules, which went into effect on October 1, according to Bloomberg. Specifically, the lawsuit claims that the Federal Reserve failed to calculate the actual incremental cost incurred by banks from debit cards. They say that the Fed made up costs that weren’t included in the statute, meaning they had free reign to come up with the 21 cent cap. The suit says that the Federal Reserve went back on their original interpretation of the law: that only those expenses spent on the authorization, clearing and settlement of a transaction should be counted. The suit says the central bank used costs like fraud losses , which aren’t covered by the law. They maintain that the cap is an “unreasonable interpretation” of the law. If the swipe fee lawsuit is successful, it could be a boon for small business owners who feel overwhelmed with rising costs. Businesses often want to take all forms of payment, including debit cards, in order to satisfy customers. But at the same time, having to pay so much to banks can be damaging to a company’s bottom line. Related Resources: Retail Groups Sue Fed Over Debit Card Rules (Bloomberg) Swipe Fee Limit Raised, Retailers to Take Hit (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise) Congress Takes Final Swipe at Swipe Fees (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

Here is the original post:
Retailers Sue Federal Reserve Over Swipe Fees

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.