Starbucks Sued by EEOC for Firing Dwarf

A Starbucks EEOC suit is in the works, and it’s the perfect example of how not to violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. After requesting a stool or small stepladder to help her reach the coffee-slinging equipment, the manager at an El Paso Starbucks fired newly-hired barista Elsa Sallard. She is a dwarf. As a refresher, under Title I of the ADA, an employer must provide a reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities who are employees or employee applicants unless doing so would cause an undue hardship. Violating this provision can cost you lost wages, compensatory damages, and years of government oversight. The Starbucks EEOC suit alleges that the company not only failed to grant Elsa Sallard a reasonable accommodation so that she could perform her duties despite her dwarfism, but that the company fired her because of that disa bility. Though the El Paso Starbucks had hired her three days prior to the stool request, Seattle Weekly reports she was fired that same day. Essentially, this lawsuit is concerned with one thing and one thing only: Would providing a stool/stepladder be an undue hardship on Starbucks? Starbucks is claiming that it fired Sallard because she could not perform her barista job without a stool, and that providing one could be a danger to customers and workers, reports Reuters. Such a hazard would arguably making the request unreasonable and outside the scope of the ADA. Seem like a pretty weak argument? That’s probably why the Starbucks EEOC suit was filed by the government in the first place. Related Resources: Starbucks sued for firing barista with dwarfism (Seattle Post-Intelligencer) Reasonable Accommodations and the Americans with Disabilities Act (FindLaw) New Guide Helps Small Business with ADA Rules (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

Original post:
Starbucks Sued by EEOC for Firing Dwarf

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.