State Officials Right to Scrap Camera Spying Program, Says ACLU

Program Posed Threat To Privacy And Wasted Resources FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 519-7829 or 549-2666; COLUMBUS- The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio was pleased that state officials announced today that they would not move forward with the Camera Integration Project (CIP). The program was designed to allow local officials access to an array of public and private surveillance cameras. The ACLU opposed the program as a dangerous encroachment of Ohioans’ privacy rights, and another increase in government surveillance of innocent Americans. ACLU of Ohio Associate Director Gary Daniels said, “As technology has grown, so has the government’s desire to use it to spy on citizens. While it may be a powerful tool to keep us safe, we cannot accept these incremental invasions into our private lives without good reason and strong protections against abuse.” In October 2010, the ACLU submitted a records request seeking all documents outlining who would have access to the system, when it may be accessed, penalties for the unauthorized use of the system, and who would responsible for oversight of the program. In its response, the state answered that they had not yet created many privacy protections to ensure the system would not be abused. “Privacy should be one of the top concerns for public officials working with new technology, but it was clear that the CIP planners had given it little consideration. From its onset, the Camera Integration Program was ill-conceived,” added Daniels. The ACLU has noted numerous privacy violations in recent years when proper protections were not in place. They included searches of Samuel “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher and American Idol contestant Crystal Bowersox’s state records, a Department of Public Safety attorney who pled guilty to intercepting emails intended for colleagues, and a Warren-area law enforcement officer using the police database to search for information on co-workers, neighbors, and local politicians. “While we all wish to improve public safety, we must do so in a way that also protects the privacy of everyday Ohioans. As officials continue to seek out new uses for technology, they should do so only when meaningful safeguards are included to prevent snooping on innocent citizens,” Daniels concluded.

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.