MAPC Publishes: The California Supreme Court’s Ruling in Brinker Restaurant Corp. Will be Made Within the Next Three Months

As previously reported, an issue of keen interest to both employers and employment law attorneys is the long-delayed Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court (165 Cal.App.4th 25) decision regarding the duty of employers to provide meal periods to employees.  At the Court of Appeal level, the Brinker decision held favorably for employers that employers only had an affirmative duty to make meal periods reasonably available to employees, and that employers were not affirmatively required to ensure that the meal periods were actually taken by the employees. 

Brinker was certified for appeal to the California Supreme Court in 2008, and since that time, half-a-dozen other appellate decisions – generally holding the same as Brinker  – have come down.  Those decisions have all been immediately de-published, and are therefore not authoritative law, pending the Supreme Court’s decision in the lead case, Brinker.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Brinker yesterday, starting the clock running on its issuance of a written decision.  That decision must be published within 90 days.  If the Court of Appeal’s ruling stands, then an avenue for damages and an historically powerful negotiating tool for plaintiffs in wage-and-hour cases will be significantly diminished.  The appellate court’s ruling overturned the previous “strict liability”-like standard employers had been held to for missed meal periods, even in instances where the missed meal period was due to an employee’s conscious decision to forego a meal period unbeknownst to the employer.   If the Supreme Court’s decision overturns the appellate court’s employer-friendly ruling, employers will no doubt complain that a reversion to the purported strict liability standard for missed meal periods is more evidence of California’s business-unfriendly climate.

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.