Groupon Sued Over Unpaid Overtime Pay

According to a class action lawsuit filed by a former sales representative at Groupon, overtime pay was not part of the company’s compensation package, despite requirements imposed by federal law. Ranita Dailey, the woman behind the suit, alleges that nearly 1,000 U.S.-based sales representatives received no overtime pay until March 2011, when Groupon executives were alerted to the problem. At that point, they began making payments, albeit at rates lower than those mandated by law. Low on details, the Groupon overtime lawsuit doesn’t explain why the company failed to pay overtime for its first three years, but it likely has something to do with a misunderstanding of federal overtime exemptions regarding commissioned employees. Employers often mistakenly believe that employees who receive a wage/salary and a commission are exempted from overtime wage laws. The truth is that federal law only exempts employees of retail or service establishments who make more than 1 1/2 times the minimum wage and who receive more than half their monthly income from commissions. If a commissioned employee does not meet both of these requirements, or falls under one of the other wholesale exemptions , he or she must be paid overtime in accordance with federal and state laws. Groupon clearly recognized this in March, and according to Crain’s , informed employees of the oversight, promising to provide back pay in a bid to prevent legal action. Nearly five months later, no compensation has been provided, and lackluster compliance has allegedly ensued, leading Dailey to file the Groupon overtime suit. Related Resources: Former sales rep sues Groupon in overtime-pay dispute (Chicago Sun-Times) Minimum Wage and Overtime Basics (FindLaw) Groupon Sued for ‘Bait and Switch’ Advertising (FindLaw’s Free Enterprise)

See the rest here:
Groupon Sued Over Unpaid Overtime Pay

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.