Birdt v. Beck

 U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit

Court of Appeals Docket #: 12-55115 Docketed: 01/17/2012
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Jonathan Birdt v. Charlie Beck, et al
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles

Summary/Issues: 2A; CCW; Suit Against LA Sheriff’s Dept and LAPD, challenging CCW issuance in Los Angeles County. 

Filing DateFiling PartyDocument Description
11.18.2014CourtOrder Appellant’s Request to Lift Stay and Remand Action
11.12.2014AppellantAppellant’s Request to Lift Stay and Remand Action
2.18.2014CourtCourt Order Staying Proceedings Pending Outcome of Peruta v. County of San Diego
12.4.2012AmiciAmicus Curiae Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence Citation of Supplemental Authority re Kachalsky v. Cacace
11.13.2012CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Amicus brief [32] filed by Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Major Cities Chiefs Association. [8408535] (DB)
11.9.2012CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Amicus brief [36] filed by Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. [8396505] (SD)
11.8.2012CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Reply brief [28] filed by Jonathan Birdt. [8395465] (SD)
11.8.2012CourtFiled clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CAG): The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence’s (“The Law Center”) motion for leave to file copies of the amicus brief in hyperlinked format on cd-rom is denied. Within 7 days after the date of this order The Law Center shall comply with the court’s November 7 order. The Law Center may in addition to the paper copies file a copy of the brief in hyperlinked format on cd-rom.
11.7.2012CourtMotion for Leave to File Copies of Amicus Curiae Brief in Hyperlinked Format on CD-Rom
11.7.2012CourtFiled clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DTO): The motion by amici curiae for leave to file amici briefs are referred to the merits panel. Within 7 days of this order, amici curiae are ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, with a red cover, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. A sample certificate is available on the Court’s website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov, at the Electronic Filing – ECF link. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. For regular U.S. mail, the address is: P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939. For overnight mail, the address is 95 Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1526.
11.7.2012CourtEntered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
11.5.12AmiciMotion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence
11.2.12AppelleeAppellees’ Joint Request for Oral Argument
10.31.12AmiciAmici Curiae Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and Major Cities Chiefs Associatisons Brief in Support of Defendants
10.30.12AppellantAppellants’ Request to Submit Case Without Oral Argument
10.30.12AppelleeAppellees’ Answering Brief
10.9.12CourtOrder Granting Appellees Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck and Los Angeles Police Department Extension of Time to File Answering Brief
9.24.12CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Answering brief [20] filed by Lee Baca and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department.
9.24.12CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Reply brief [22] filed by Jonathan Birdt.
9.20.12CourtFiled clerk order: The reply brief [22] submitted by Jonathan Birdt is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF.
9.20.12Appellant’sAppellants’ Reply Brief
9.19.12CourtFiled clerk order: The answering brief [20] submitted by Lee Baca and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF.
9.18.12CourtSubmitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Lee Baca and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Date of service: 09/18/2012.
9.18.12AppelleesAppellees Brief of The LASD Defendants
9.14.12AppelleesMotion For Extension of Time To File Appellees’ Answering Brief; Declaration of KJehl T. Johansen
8.25.12AppellantCorrespondence to Court Request to Consolidate and Expedite Birdt, Thompson and Raulinaitis Cases
10.9.12CourtOrder Re Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief
7.12.12AppelleesBirdt v. Beck_Motion for Extension of Time to File LASD Appellees Answering Brief; Declaration of Jennifer A.D. Lehman
7.6.12AppelleesMotion for Extension of Time to File Appellees’ Answering Brief; Declaration of Kjehl T. Johansen
7.5.12AppellantMotion to Consolidate Cases; Adance Answer Dates and Opposition to Request for Extension of Time
6.7.12CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Opening brief filed by Jonathan Birdt. [8206335] (SD)
6.1.12AppellantFiled Appellant Jonathan Birdt excerpts of record in 3 volumes. Served on 05/26/2012. [8200196] (WP)
5.31.12CourtFiled clerk order: The opening brief submitted by Jonathan Birdt is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8196616] (WP)
5.26.12AppellantAppellants’ Opening Brief
2.16.12CourtBill of Costs
 1.30.12CourtFiled order MEDIATION (VLS): Based on a review of the Mediation Questionnaire, this case is not selected for inclusion in the Mediation Program. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. Counsel for any party interested in obtaining assistance from the court in pursuing settlement of the case on appeal or learning more about the Mediation Program is encouraged to contact Stephen Liacouras, Circuit Mediator, by e-mail stephen_liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov or fax at (415) 355-8566. The communication will be kept confidential, if requested, from the other parties in the case. Counsel are requested to send copies of this order to their clients. [8049083] (WL)
 1.27.12CourtAdded attorney Jennifer Ann Delgado Lehman for Lee Baca Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, in case 12-55115. [8047209] (EL)
1.27.12AppelleesFiled (ECF) notice of appearance of Jennifer A.D. Lehman for Appellees Lee Baca and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Date of service: 01/27/2012. [8047196] (JAL)
1.26.12CourtAttorneys Elizabeth A. Mitchell & Wendy Shapero substituted by Attorney Kjehl Thomas Johansen. [8046228] (EL)
1.26.12AppelleesFiled (ECF) notice of appearance of Kjehl T. Johansen for Appellees Charlie Beck and Los Angeles Police Department. Date of service: 01/26/2012. [8046206] (KTJ)
1.18.12AppellantFiled (ECF) Appellant Jonathan Birdt Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/18/2012. [8034700] (JB)
1.18.12CourtAdded attorney Jonathan Birdt for Jonathan Birdt, in case 12-55115. [8034684] (EL)
1.17.12AppellantFiled (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan W. Birdt for Appellant Jonathan Birdt. Date of service: 01/17/2012. [8034529] (JB)
1.17.12CourtDOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/24/2012. Transcript ordered by 02/13/2012. Transcript due 05/14/2012. Appellant Jonathan Birdt opening brief due 06/25/2012. Appellees Lee Baca, Charlie Beck, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Los Angeles Police Department answering brief due 07/25/2012. Appellant’s optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8033078] (BG)
2.16.12CourtBill of Costs Taxed
1.30.12DefendantBill of Costs
1.30.12DefendantNotice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs
1.20.12DefendantLASD Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Relating Cases_Raulinaitis v. LASD
1.20.12DefendantLASD Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Relating Cases
1.19.12PlaintiffOpposition to Request to Relate Cases
1.18.12DefendantNotice of Related Cases_Raulinaitis v. L.A.
1.18.12DefendantNotice of Related Cases
1.17.12CourtNotification by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket 12-55115 Re Notice of Appeal
1.14.12AppellantNotice of Appeal
1.13.12CourtOrder Re Plaintiff’s and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
1.8.12PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Request for Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
10.24.11CourtMinutes Re In Chambers Orders Takin October 31, 2011 Status Conference Off Calendar
9.19.11CourtMinutes Re Final Pretrial Conference
8.24.11DefendantsStipulation Vacating All Dates and Deadlines
8.11.11CourtNotice to Filer of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents
8.9.11DefendantsDeclaration of Julie Basco In Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
8.9.11DefendantsSupplemental Declaration of Franklin Zimring In Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
6.17.11CourtOrder on Jury_Court Trial
5.25.11CourtInitial Standing Order for Cases Assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt
5.17.11PlaintiffCorrected Objection to Defendants Supplemental Authority
5.17.11PlaintiffObjection to Defendants Supplemental Authority
5.17.11DefendantsNotice of Recent Decision Granting Summary Judgment to County of Yolo
5.6.11DefendantsOrder Waiving Oral Arguments on Motions for Summary Judgment and Non-Opposition to Brady Amicus Motion
5.4.11CourtMinute In Chambers Order re Transfer of Case to John Kronstadt
5.4.11CourtMinute In Chambers Order re Transfer of Case to John Kronstadt
5.2.11PlaintiffsReply to Motion for Summary Judgment
5.2.11DefendantsResponse in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Objection re Declaration of Franklin Zimring
5.2.11DefendantsDefendants’ Objections to Plaintiffs’ Evidence In Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Concurrent Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
5.2.11DefendantsNotice of Lodging re Reply
5.2.11DefendantsReply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Concurrent Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
5.2.11DefendantsObjections in Opposition re Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Objections to Plaintiff’s Evidence
5.2.11DefendantsOpposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
4.29.11CourtOrder Accepting Document as Filed re Motion Related Document
4.29.11CourtNotice of Filer Deficiencies
4.28.11PlaintiffProposed Order re Motion for Summary Judgment
4.26.11CourtOrder of the Chief Judge transferring case from Judge Klausner to Judge Kronstadt
4.28.11PlaintiffsReply ISO Motion for Summary 1.   Declaration of Lawrence Mudgett 2.  Declaration of Jonathan Birdt
4.28.11PlaintiffsJoint Statement of Waiver of Oral Argument on Motions for Summary Judgment and Non-Opposition to Brady Filing
4.26.11CourtOrder of the Chief Judge
4.25.11CourtOrder re Vacating Settlement Conference
4.25.11PlaintiffStatement Withdrawing Ex Parte Application
4.25.11PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Joint Opposition to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment 1.  Response to Defendant’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts 2.  Response to Defendant’s Amended Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts 3.  Notice of Objection to the Declaration of Franklin Zimring
4.25.11CourtNotice of Clerical Error
4.25.11DefendantsStipulation to Vacate Settlement Conference
4.20.11Brady Center to Prevent Gun ViolenceApplication of Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence to File Brief as Amicus Curiae
4.20.11DefendantsNotice of Lodging re Motion for Summary Judgment 1.  Defendants’ Amended Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts 2.  Declaration of Jennifer Lehman and Exhibit A 3.  Exhibit B, C, D, and E to Declaration of Jennifer Lehman
4.19.11CourtOrder to Strike Electronically Filed Documents
4.19.11PlaintiffEx Parte Application to Strike Document
4.18.11PlaintiffEx Parte Application to Reschedule Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment to Allow Plaintiff to Conduct Necessary Discovery 1.  Memorandum re Request
4.18.11DefendantsOpposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
4.18.11DefendantsNotice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment 1.   Def. Statement of Facts 2.   Proposed Order 3.   Declaration of Elizabeth Mitchell 4.   Declaration of Richard Tompkins 5.   Declaration of Frank E. Zimring 6.   Declaration of Conrado Torrez 7.  Declaration of Rolf Embom
4.18.11DefendantsStatement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law; Evidence and Response to Plaintiff’s Separate Statement and Concurrent OPPOSITION to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
4.18.11DefendantsMotion for Summary Judgment and Concurrent Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
4.4.11CourtProtective Order Ordering that Plaintiff is Precluded from Taking the Deposition of LAPD Chief Charlie Beck
4.4.11DefendantsReply in Support of Exparte Application for Order Preventing Plaintiff from Taking LAPD Chief Charlie Beck’s Deposition
4.1.11PlaintiffOpposition to Ex Parte Application for Order Preventing Plaintiff from Taking LAPD Chief Charlie Beck’s Deposition
4.1.11DefendantsEx Parte Application for Order Preventing Plaintiff from Taking LAPD Chief Charlie Beck’s Deposition
3.15.11CourtOrder Regarding Settlement Conference
3.9.11CourtMinutes in Chambers Order
3.8.11CourtOrder Denying Motion to Stay Case
3.8.11CourtPrder Granting Defendants Ex Parte Application to Continue the Hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment
3.8.11CourtOrder Granting Defendants Request for Additional Time to Oppose Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
3.7.11DefendantsEx Parte Application for Ruling on Defendants’ Requests for Continuance
3.3.11CourtMinute in Chamber Scheduling of Settlement Conference
3.3.11OrderGranting Notice and Request of Settlement Procedure Section
3.1.11PlaintiffOpposition to Request for Continuance
3.1.11DefendantsRequest to Continue Motion for Summary Judgment
3.1.11DefendantsRequest to Continue Motion for Summary Judgment
2.16.11CourtAmended Order for Jury Trial
2.16.11CourtOrder for Jury Trial
2.16.11DefendantsReply in Support of Motion to Stay Case
2.15.11DefendantsNotice of Non-Opposition Motion to Stay-Case
2.14.11CourtMinutes of Scheduling Conference
2.14.11PlaintiffMemorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay Case
2.14.11DefendantsRequest for Judicial Notice
2.14.11DefendantsDeclaration of Elizabeth Mitchell ISO Motion to Stay Case
2.14.11DefendantsNotice of Motion and Motion to Stay Case
2.4.11DefendantsJoint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan
1.27.11DefendantsNotice of Change of Attorney Information
1.10.11DefendantsJoint Report Rule 26(f) Plan
1.9.11PlaintiffSupplement to Motion for Summary Judgment
1.9.11PlaintiffDeclaration of Jonathan Birdt ISO Motion for Summary Judgment
1.9.11PlaintiffNotice and Request of Settlement Procedure Selection (sp1); Parties Request to Appear Before Magistrate Judge for Settlement Proceedings
1.7.11CourtMinute Order in Chambers
1.7.11CourtMinute In Chambers Notice to All Parties and Order
1.6.11PlaintiffNotice and Request of Settlement Procedure Selection
1.4.11PlaintiffNotice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment 1.  Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2.  Supplemental Separate Statement 3.  Declaration of Jonathan W. Birdt
1.2.11PlaintiffAmended Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
12.30.10CourtOrder Striking Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Comply with Local Rules
12.30.10PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment

  1. Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
  2. Birdt Declaration in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
  3. Separate Statement in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
12.27.10CourtNotice to Plaintiff re Deficiencies in Notice of Rule 26(f) Meeting of Counsel
12.23.10PlaintiffNotice of Rule 26(f) Meeting of Counsel
12.23.10PlaintiffFirst Request to Dismiss Does 1-50
12.21.10Defendants Beck & LAPDCertificate of Interested Parties
12.21.10Defendants Beck and LAPDAnswer to Amended Complaint
12.20.10Defendant LAPDCertification as to Interested Parties
12.20.10Defendant LAPDAnswer to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand
12.17.10Defendants Baca & LACSDNotice of Interested Parties
12.17.10Defendants Baca & LACSDAnswer to Amended Complaint
12.03.10PlaintiffNotice of Change of Attorney Information
11.30.10PlaintiffFirst Amended Complaint
11.12.10CourtStanding Order re Newly Assigned Cases
11.04.10PlaintiffCertification and Notice of Interested Parties
11.04.10PlaintiffComplaint