Raulinaitis v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department

Filing Date Filing Party Document
11/18/2014 Court Order Denying Appellant’s Request to Lift Stay and Remand Action
11/12/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Request to Lift Stay and Remand Action 
3/20/2013 Court Filed Appellee LASD paper copies of excerpts of record [15] in 1 volume(s).
3/20/2013 Court Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [15] filed by LASD.
3/15/2013 Court Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [16] filed by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis.
3/13/2013 Court Filed clerk order: The reply brief [16] submitted by Rima Raulinaitis and Sigitas Raulinaitis is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF.
3/13/2013 Court Filed clerk order: The answering brief [15] submitted by LASD is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [16] submitted by LASD. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6.
3/13/2013

Appellant

Appellants’ Reply Brief
3/13/2013

Appellee

Answering Brief of Appellee
8/16/2012

Appellant

Appellants’ Opening Brief
08/15/2012

Court

NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 12-56508, 9TH CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 35 as to Plaintiffs Rima Raulinaitis, Sigitas Raulinaitis. 
08/15/2012

Appellant

Notice of Appeal
08/13/2012 Court MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING Motion for Summary Judgment 17 by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald: This matter is before the Court on Defendant Motion for Summary Judgment 17 . The Court found the matter appropriate for submission on the papers without oral argument. The matter was therefore removed from the Court’s calendar (Docket No. 28). For the reasons discussed in this Order, the LASD’s Motion is GRANTED. Because the LASD’s policy implementing the California Penal Code’s concealed weapons restriction is constitutionally permissible, both facially and as applied to the Raulinaitises, there has been no violation of their constitutional rights, and there was no resulting violation of 42 USC 1983 and 1988. Accordingly, Defendant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Defendant’s Motion is therefore granted. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2012)
08/12/2012

Plaintiff

TRIAL BRIEF Amended Rima Raulinaitis, Sigitas Raulinaitis.. (Birdt, Jonathan) 
08/12/2012

Plaintiff

TRIAL BRIEF Rima Raulinaitis, Sigitas Raulinaitis.. (Birdt, Jonathan) 
08/10/2012

Plaintiff

Notice of Supplemental Authority
07/19/2012

Court

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald. The Final Pre-Trial Conference scheduled for August 6, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. 9 is hereby VACATED pending the Court’s decision on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 17 . (kbr) 
07/02/2012

Defendant

NOTICE OF RECENT DECISION GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ON ISSUES WHICH ARE SUBJECT OF DEFENDANTS’ PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Complaint 17 filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (Lehman, Jennifer) 
06/07/2012

Court

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING motion for Summary Judgment 17 OFF CALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald: The Court finds the matter appropriate for submission on the papers without oral argument. The matter is therefore removed from the Court’s calendar subject to resetting should the Court determine that oral argument is needed. (jp) 
06/04/2012 Court ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge S. James Otero, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 11-06154 SJO(JCx) (rn) 
05/25/2012

Defendant

Rebuttal to Plaintiffs’ Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts
05/25/2012

Defendant

Objections to Plaintiff’s Evidence in Opposition to LASD’s Motion for Summary Judgment
05/25/2012

Defendant

Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
05/16/2012 Court MINUTE IN CHAMBERS TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE FITZGERALD by Judge Michael W Fitzgerald: This action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge. The magistrate judge’s assignment remains the same. Please substitute the initials MWF in place of the initials JHN. The case number will now read: CV 11-8026-MWF (JCGx). As documents are routed using the judge’s initials, it is important to use the correct initials on all subsequent filings. (See attached Minute Order for further details). All hearing dates will remain as previously set. (jp) (Entered: 05/16/2012)
05/16/2012

Plaintiff

Declaration of Lawrence Mudgett in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
05/16/2012

Plaintiff

Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
05/11/2012

Court

ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#12-042) approved by Chief Judge Audrey B. Collins. IT IS ORDERED, with the concurrence of the Case Management and Assignment Committee, that this case be reassigned from the calendar of Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen to the calendar of Judge Michael W Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 11-8026 MWF(JCGx). (sn) (Entered: 05/14/2012)
05/07/2012

Defendant

Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
05/07/2012

Defendant

Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts & Conclusions of Law
05/07/2012

Defendant

Motion for Summary Judgment
01/25/2012

Court

ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge John A Kronstadt, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. CV 10-08377 JAK(JEMx) (rn) (Entered: 01/25/2012)
01/20/2012

Defendant

REPLY filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department to Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition (non-motion) 13 (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/20/2012)
01/20/2012 Defendant REPLY filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department to Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition (non-motion) 13 (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/20/2012)
01/19/2012

Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition to request to relate cases Re: Amended Document (Non-Motion) 12 , Notice of Related Case(s) 10 , Notice of Related Case(s) 11 (Birdt, Jonathan) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
01/19/2012

Defendant

AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Amendment to Notice of Related Case(s) 11 amended to include pages 2 and 3 inadvertently left out when the document was converted to PDF format (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
01/18/2012

Defendant

NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Related Case(s): 11CV-08026 JHN (JCGx), 10CV-08377 JAK (JEMx), 11CV-06154 SJO (JCx) (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/18/2012)
01/18/2012

Defendant

NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. Related Case(s): 11CV-08026 JHN (JCGx), 10CV-08377 JAK (JEMx), 11CV-06154 SJO (JCx) (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 01/18/2012)
11/29/2011

Court

ORDER RE JURY TRIAL and ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR PROGRAM by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/6/2012 10:30 AM and Jury Trial set for 9/4/2012 08:30 AM before Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen. (Attachments: # 1 ADR Referral) (ama) (Entered: 11/29/2011)
11/21/2011

Defendant

JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3, filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department.. (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 11/21/2011)
10/31/2011 Court ORDER FOR RULE 26 JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen, (bp) (Entered: 10/31/2011)
10/28/2011

Defendant

Answer to Complaint
10/26/2011

Defendant

NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, identifying Sigitas Raulinaitis, Rima Raulinaitis, Jonathan Birdt, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. (Lehman, Jennifer) (Entered: 10/26/2011)
10/11/2011

Plaintiff

PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sigitas Raulinaitis, Rima Raulinaitis, upon Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department served on 10/6/2011, answer due 10/27/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kathleen Camacho in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Birdt, Jonathan) (Entered: 10/11/2011)
09/28/2011

Court

NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed.(ghap) (Entered: 09/28/2011)
09/28/2011

Plaintiff

CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Rima Raulinaitis, Sigitas Raulinaitis. (ghap) (mg). (Entered: 09/28/2011)
09/28/2011 Court 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint – (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department. (ghap) (Entered: 09/28/2011)
09/28/2011

Plaintiff

Complaint