Wal-Mart $187M Verdict: Denied Meal, Rest Breaks

A Pennsylvania appeals court has upheld a $187.6 million Wal-Mart verdict. The suit was filed by employees , who claimed that if you worked for retail giant Wal-Mart, meal breaks and rest breaks were regularly cut. The appeals court affirmed the lower court’s finding that Wal-Mart’s actions violated state wage and hour laws, Bloomberg reports. The class action represented about 187,000 current and former Wal-Mart employees who worked in Pennsylvania between 1998 and 2006, according to Reuters. Named plaintiffs Dolores Hummel and Michele Braun alleged that Wal-Mart store managers routinely pressured them to entirely skip their required breaks or cut them short, according to Bloomberg. The women’s attorneys argued that the company had forced workers to skip about 33 million rest breaks between 1998 and 2001 in an effort to cut costs and increase productivity. Wal-Mart, in trying to defend its case, apparently also tried to argue that their own business records were so unreliable and inaccurate that they should not be used, Judith Spanier, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, told Reuters. While the $187.6 million verdict is probably one of the largest single Wal-Mart has faced over meal breaks and rest breaks, Wal-Mart has previously agreed to pay about $640 million in damages in 2008 to settle around 60 other state and federal lawsuits over missed breaks, according to Bloomberg. What did Wal-Mart do wrong? Well, if all the facts in the complaint are true – and apparently a Pennsylvania jury thought they were – they were violating state law by encouraging employees to cut their meal breaks and not take their rest breaks. Many states have laws that require employers to give employees certain breaks throughout the work day. Not all of these breaks may be paid, and many states require only unpaid breaks. But, breaks are usually required – and must be given, otherwise employees can file suit. The Wal-Mart verdict may very well mean that the company will be more careful in the future. But, denying employees their rights is not something that only happens at Wal-Mart. Meal breaks and rest breaks are routinely the issue in many employee lawsuits. Related Resources: Wal-Mart loses $187.6M worker break case (Reuters) Getting Paid for Not Working (FindLaw) $86 Million Walmart Settlement in Wage Lawsuit (FindLaw’s Decided) Walmart Jewelry Is Pulled over Cadmium Toxicity Fears (FindLaw’s Injured)

Read more:
Wal-Mart $187M Verdict: Denied Meal, Rest Breaks

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.