Why You Can’t Discriminate Against Unemployed

With so many people unemployed, new job openings often receive hundreds of replies. It’s difficult to sort through so many resumes, let alone spare the time and money to do so. To help whittle down the applicant pool, a lot of businesses are requiring applicants to be currently employed. While it may seem like a brilliant idea, the fact is that when you discriminate against unemployed persons, you may actually be breaking the law. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced this week that it is looking into whether employers are unlawfully requiring job applicants to be currently employed . Though the Commission does not have much data, reports The Wall Street Journal , employment lawyers say it isn’t as widespread as it is claimed to be. If you discriminate against unemployed persons, or are thinking about it with that next job opening, consider the following. The pertinent federal laws are Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) . The first bars discrimination on the basis of race and color, while the second does so for persons over 40 years of age. Besides the obvious, each statute outlaws hiring policies that disproportionately harm protected groups of people . This is usually referred to as disparate impact, or disparate treatment theory. It focuses on effect, meaning that no overt discrimination is required. When you discriminate against unemployed persons in hiring, you may be running afoul of this portion of the statute. January numbers placed the unemployment rate for blacks at 15.7%, Latinos at 11.9%, and whites at 8%. Furthermore, The Wall Street Journal reports that one-third of all short to medium-term unemployed persons were over the age of 40, whereas the number was over half for the long-term unemployed. These numbers, when combined with discrimination against the unemployed, decrease the chance of an ethnic minority being considered for the job by one third. The inquiry doesn’t end here. The law allows employers to implement these kinds of policies when necessary, reasonable and if there are no better alternatives. This is a complicated consideration of factors that will require a lawyer , so if you’re concerned about your policy, it would be wise to do so. Related Resources: Businesses are refusing to hire the unemployed, commission told (Los Angeles Times) EEOC Asks: Are Employers Discriminating Against The Jobless? (Huffington Post) Speakers at EEOC Meeting Say Ban on Unemployed Job Applicants Could Discriminate Illegally (ABA Journal) Unemployed need not apply (Kansas City Star)

Read more:
Why You Can’t Discriminate Against Unemployed

Twitter Follow

Follow us on

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates's attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Texas, and the District of Columbia.