Tracy Rifle and Pistol LLC v. Harris

U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System (Sacramento)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cv-02626-TLN-DAD

Tracy Rifle and Pistol LLC, et al. v. Harris, et al.
Assigned to: District Judge Troy L. Nunley
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 11/10/2014
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Summary/Issues: 1A: Challenges CPC 26820, which prohibits FFLS from displaying handgun advertisements visible from outside of store.

Filing DateFiling PartyDocument Description
Ninth Circuit Court
3/17/2016CourtMandate
2/23/2016CourtMemorandum Decision Affirming District Court Order
2/17/2016AppellantAppellants Response to Panel Question in No. 15-16501
2/9/2016CourtARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN
1/20/2016AppelleeNotice of Citation of Supplemental Authority re Retail Digital Network v. Appelsmith, No. 13-56069
1/14/2016AppellantNotice of Supplemental Authority re Retail Digital Network v. Applesmith, No. 13-56069
12/1/2015AppelleeAcknowledgment of Hearing Notice for Respondents
11/30/2015CourtOrder Not Consolidating Appeals for Oral Argument
11/30/2015AppellantAcknowledgment of Hearing Notice for Appellants
11/30/2015CourtNotice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, February 9, 2016 – 09:00 A.M. – Courtroom 1 – James R Browning US Cthse, 95 7th St, San Francisco, CA. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . When you have reviewed the calendar, download the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form , complete the form, and file it via Appellate ECF or return the completed form to: SAN FRANCISCO Office.
10/27/2015AppelleeAppellees Regarding Availability for Oral Argument
10/26/2015AppellantAppellants Correspondence Regarding Availability for Oral Argument
10/22/2015CourtThis case is being considered for the February 2016 oral argument calendar. The exact date of your oral argument has not been determined at this time. The following is a link to the upcoming court sessions: # http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/uploads/calendar/sitdates_2016.pdf . Please review these upcoming dates immediately to determine if you have any conflicts with them. If you do have conflicts, please inform the Court within 7 days of this notice by sending a letter to the Court using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : File Correspondence to Court; Subject : regarding availability for oral argument). The Court discourages motions to continue after this 7-day period. The clerk’s office takes conflict dates into consideration in scheduling oral arguments but cannot guarantee that every request will be honored. Your case will be assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. In addition, if parties are discussing settlement or would like to discuss settlement before argument, they should contact the mediation unit immediately ( # ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov ). Once the case is calendared, it is unlikely that the court will postpone argument for settlement discussions.
10/9/2015Court(#15) Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 13 ] filed by appellants. [9714024] (SD)
10/5/2015CourtCourt Order Requesting Hard Copies of Appellants’ Reply Brief
10/5/2015AppellantAppellants’ Reply Brief
9/25/2015CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 9 ] filed by Kamala D. Harris and Stephen J. Lindley.
9/25/2015CourtFiled Appellees Kamala D. Harris and Stephen J. Lindley paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 9 ] in 1 volume.
9/23/2015CourtOrder Requesting Paper Copies of Appellees’ Brief
9/21/2015AppelleeAppellees’ Supplemental Excerpts of Record
9/21/2015AppellantAppellees’ Brief
9/14/2015CourtOrder Not Selecting Case for Mediation
8/28/2015CourtFiled Appellants’ paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 4 ] in 1 volume(s). [9665147] (LA)
8/28/2015CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 4 ] filed by appellants. [9664785] (SD)
8/26/2015CourtOrder Not Selecting Case for Mediation
8/24/2015AppellantsAppellants Excerpts of Record
8/24/2015AppellantsAppellants Opening Brief
USDC – California – Eastern District
9/15/2016DefendantProposed-Order-Modifying-Pretrial-Scheduling-Order
9/15/2016DefendantRevised-Joint-Application-to-Modify-the-Pretrial-Scheduling-Order-Supporting-Declaration-of-Nelson-Richards
9/15/2016CourtMINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/15/2016: The parties’ Joint Request to Modify the Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. #47 ) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Should the parties desire to refile such request, the parties are directed to submit a proposal in which all of the current pretrial dates, including the trial date, are amended in compliance with the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order, thus affording the Court adequate time between the applicable deadlines.
9/14/2016PlaintiffJoint-Application-to-Modify-Pretrial-Scheduling-Order-Supporting-Declaration-of-Stephen-M-Duvernay
8/15/2016PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Disclosure of Expert Witness
8/15/2016PlaintiffExpert Witness Report of Professor Gary Kleck

Exhibit 1 – Curriculum Vitae of Gary Kleck

8/2/2016CourtOrder of Reassignment_
7/26/2016DefendantDefendants’ Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
3/17/2016CourtMandate
3/7/2016CourtOrder of Reassignment
2/26/2016DefendantJoint Application to Modify The Pretrial Scheduling Order and Supporting Declaration of Nelsons Richards
2/23/2016CourtMemorandum Opinion Affirming District Court Order
11/6/2015CourtOrder of Reassignment
10/19/2015CourtPretrial Scheduling Order
8/13/2015CourtUSCA CASE NUMBER 15-16501 for #33 Notice of Appeal, filed by PRK Arms, Inc., Ten Percent Firearms, Alex Rolsky, Robert Adams, Imbert & Smithers, Inc., Tracy Rifle and Pistol LLC, Wesley Morris, Michael Baryla, Jeffrery Mullen, Sacramento Black Rifle, Inc.. (Zignago, K.)
7/29/2015PlaintiffTracy Rifle_Joint Status Report
7/28/2015CourtNotification of Appeal Being Processed
7/27/2015PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal and Representation Statement
7/16/2015CourtOrder Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/1/2015CourtOrder Regarding Rule 26(f) Conference and Joint Status Report
3/26/2015DefendantStipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Rule 26(f) Conference and Joint Status Report
3/10/2015DefendantDefendants’ Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint
3/10/2015DefendantNotice of Change of Address and Telephone Number for Nelson R. Richards, Lead Attorney for Defendants
3/6/2015CourtMINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2015: On the Court’s own motion, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. # 5 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 3/12/2015 is VACATED. If the Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M)
3/4/2015PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Reply Memo In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
3/3/2015CourtMINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/3/2015 GRANTING Plaintiffs’ unopposed request for relief from page limitation requirement (ECF No. # 23 ). Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ reply in support of their motion for preliminary injunction shall not exceed 15 pages. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M)
3/2/2015PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Unopposed Request for Relief from Page Limitation Requirement for Reply In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
3/2/2015Plaintiff[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Request for Relief from Page Limitation Requirement for Reply In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
2/27/2015PlaintiffFirst Amended Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, or Other Relief
2/25/2015DefendantNOTICE of APPEARANCE by Emmanuelle S. Soichet on behalf of defendants Kamala D. Harris and Stephen J. Lindley. Attorney Soichet, Emmanuelle S. added. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service) (Soichet, Emmanuelle) Modified on 2/25/2015 (Marciel, M)
2/25/2015CourtStipulation and Order Regarding Joinder of Additional Plaintiffs
2/23/2015DefendantDeclaration of Nelson R. Richards In Support of Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
2/23/2015DefendantDefendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
2/18/2015PlaintiffStipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Joinder of Additional Plaintiffs
1/9/2015CourtORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/9/2015 ORDERING that the 1/29/2015 hearing on Plaintiffs’ # 5 motion for preliminary injunction is CONTINUED to 3/12/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Defendants’ Response in Opposition will be due on or before 2/23/2015, and Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief will be due on or before 3/4/2015. The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference and Joint Status Report ordered by this Court on 11/10/2014 shall be postponed until 14 days after the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. (Zignago, K.)
1/8/2015DefendantStipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Preliminary Injunction Hearing and November 10, 2014 Order Requiring Joint Status Report
12/1/2014DefendantDefendants’ Declination to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge
12/1/2014DefendantDefendants’ Answer
11/24/2014PlaintiffDeclination to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge
11/17/2014PlaintiffProposed Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Robert Adams In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Michael Baryla In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Dean Rowden In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Jeffrey Mullen In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Wesley Morris In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
11/17/2014PlaintiffProof of Service of Summons and Supporting Documents
11/10/2014CourtOrder Requiring Joint Status Report
11/10/2014PlaintiffSummons in a Civil Case
11/10/2014PlaintiffComplaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, or Other Relief