Default Image
  • 13
    Jan

MAPC Lawyers File Amicus Brief in Electronic Public Records Act Case

By C.D. Michel Michel & Associates filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief today in the California Court of Appeal, in support of the Sierra Club’s lawsuit against Orange County to obtain GIS parcel data under the California Public Records Act (PRA). The PRA is an invaluable tool that MAPC uses regularly on behalf of its clients...

Read More
Default Image
  • 7
    Jan

MAPC Lawsuit Sets Legal Precedents for Defending Hunter’s Rights

Although the case is still pending and a final ruling is yet to be issued, NRA's intervention on behalf of its members in the case Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al., has already resulted in several legal victories. CBD’s lawsuit, filed on January 27, 2009, alleges that the Bureau of Land Management...

Read More
Default Image
  • 5
    Jan

MAPC Lawyers Publish “What Didn’t Happen in 2010 for California Wage-and-Hour Laws”

by Joshua R. Dale and Tamara M. Rider Appellate decisions and legislation in the wage-and-hour field have, in recent years, resulted in significant changes in how wage-and-hour claims would be litigated. 2008, for example, brought the Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court(4th Dist.) 165 Cal. App. 4th 25 decision, which employers saw as a step back from an...

Read More
Default Image
  • 28
    Dec

APPEAL FILED IN LAWSUIT CHALLENGING SAN DIEGO CCW POLICIES

Acting quickly, on December 14, 2010, attorneys for the NRA, CRPA Foundation, and a number of San Diego residents filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to overturn a Southern District Court ruling from December 10, 2010 that upheld San Diego Sheriff William Gore’s restrictive policies on issuing permits to carry concealed...

Read More
Default Image
  • 12
    Nov

NRA AND CRPA FOUNDATION SUBMIT COMMENTS OPPOSING CALIFORNIA DTSC PROPOSED REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT GREEN CHEMISTRY INITIATIVE

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has submitted its Proposed Regulations to the Office of Administrative Law that would implement the so-called "Green Chemistry Initiative." The submission begins the official rulemaking process, including the public comment period. To see the proposed regulations click here . Visit link: NRA AND CRPA FOUNDATION SUBMIT COMMENTS OPPOSING CALIFORNIA DTSC...

Read More
Default Image
  • 2
    Oct

The Limits of Crime-Gun Trace Data

The Limits of Crime-Gun Trace Data A new article published by the University of Wyoming’s Firearms Research Center examines how ATF and California crime-gun trace data can be misinterpreted to imply wrongdoing by lawful firearm retailers. The Limits of Crime-Gun Trace Data, authored by Jason A. Davis, C.D. “Chuck” Michel, and Anna M. Barvir, responds to recent reporting...

Read More
Default Image
  • 6
    Jul

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Landmark Second Amendment Cases

  The United States Supreme Court concluded its current term by granting certiorari in the consolidated cases of Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, marking another significant development in Second Amendment jurisprudence. The cases present several important constitutional questions that have remained unresolved. Among them: What qualifies as an "arm" protected by the Second Amendment? How...

Read More
Default Image
  • 25
    Jun

Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii’s “Sensitive Places” Law In Landmark Second Amendment Victory

  In a major victory for Second Amendment advocates nationwide, the United States Supreme Court today issued its decision in Wolford v. Lopez, holding that Hawaii's expansive "sensitive places" carry restrictions violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's prior ruling and reaffirmed that states may not broadly prohibit the carrying of firearms in...

Read More
Default Image
  • 19
    Jun

Supreme Court Delivers Important Second Amendment Victory in United States v. Hemani

  The U.S. Supreme Court issued an important Second Amendment decision in United States v. Hemani, striking down the federal government's attempt to prosecute a firearm owner under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) based solely on his status as an unlawful user of marijuana. The case involved a man who used marijuana several times per week and possessed a...

Read More
Default Image
  • 18
    Jun

Duncan v. Bonta Nears Historic Supreme Court Action After More Than 20 Relists

  The Supreme Court's continued consideration of Duncan v. Bonta has become one of the most closely watched developments in Second Amendment litigation. After being relisted more than 20 times, the case is approaching historic territory and has left gun owners, legal scholars, and constitutional advocates wondering when the Court will finally act. At the heart of Duncan...

Read More
Default Image
  • 14
    May

The Constitutional Fight Over Magazine Bans Is Heating Up

  As the firearms industry and Second Amendment community continue waiting for movement from the Supreme Court in Duncan v. Bonta, the national legal landscape surrounding magazine bans continues to intensify. Last week, the federal Department of Justice announced a lawsuit challenging Colorado’s prohibition on magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds. The action adds even more...

Read More
Default Image
  • 21
    Apr

Major Second Amendment Victory Strikes Down California’s Youth Marketing Ban

  A decisive court victory in Junior Shooting Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Bonta has struck down California’s unconstitutional restrictions on so-called “youth marketing” in the firearms space—protecting both First and Second Amendment rights. The ruling confirms that the State overstepped its authority by attempting to limit lawful communications and suppress youth participation in shooting sports. Just as importantly,...

Read More
Default Image
  • 1
    Apr

A Major First Amendment Victory: AB 2571 Struck Down for Good

  Michel & Associates, P.C. is proud to celebrate a decisive and complete victory in Junior Shooting Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Bonta—a landmark challenge to California’s unconstitutional attempt to ban lawful communications about firearms, firearm-related products, and events allegedly “targeting minors.” Gavin Newsom signed California Assembly Bill 2571 in an effort that threatened junior shooting sports and sought...

Read More
Default Image
  • 19
    Mar

Rhode v. Bonta Heads to Ninth Circuit En Banc Panel: A Critical Moment for California’s Ammunition Rights

  After years of uncertainty for pro-Second Amendment cases before en banc panels in the Ninth Circuit, Rhode v. Bonta now heads into oral argument on March 25 in Pasadena before what may be the most favorable panel composition we could hope for. In a special edition of California Rifle & Pistol Association TV released this afternoon, Chuck...

Read More
Default Image
  • 11
    Mar

D.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban — Creating Major Split with Ninth Circuit in Duncan v. Bonta

  In a significant Second Amendment development, the Benson v. United States decision from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on so-called “large-capacity magazines,” ruling in a 2–1 decision that the restriction violates the Second Amendment. The ruling carries national implications because it creates a direct conflict with the position taken...

Read More

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and the District of Columbia.