Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Landmark Second Amendment Cases

 

The United States Supreme Court concluded its current term by granting certiorari in the consolidated cases of Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, marking another significant development in Second Amendment jurisprudence.

The cases present several important constitutional questions that have remained unresolved. Among them: What qualifies as an “arm” protected by the Second Amendment? How is the “common use” test applied?

The Court’s answer will likely establish a nationwide framework for evaluating the constitutionality of firearm and magazine bans and other restrictions under the Second Amendment Constitution.

The announcement follows the Supreme Court’s recent rulings in United States v. Hemani and Wolford v. Lopez, continuing what has become one of the most consequential periods for Second Amendment litigation in decades.

The Court’s eventual decision will almost certainly affect pending cases, including Duncan v. Bonta, the challenge to California’s large-capacity magazine ban. Michel & Associates, P.C. serves as counsel in Duncan and continues to advocate for the constitutional rights of California firearm owners. We will be coordinating a nationwide amicus brief campaign to make sure the Court considers the interest of our clients, and all California gun owners.

To discuss the significance of today’s announcement, Michel & Associates Managing Partner and CRPA President & General Counsel C.D. “Chuck” Michel joins Kevin Small on the latest episode of CRPA TV. The discussion examines the Court’s decision to hear these cases, what legal questions are now before the Court, and what the next Supreme Court term could mean for Second Amendment rights nationwide.

Watch the latest CRPA TV episode for Chuck Michel’s analysis and stay connected with Michel & Associates for continuing coverage of these important cases and other developments affecting firearm law in California and across the United States.

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and the District of Columbia.