Default Image
  • 15
    Apr

California – Op Ed: Addicted to Incarceration: Will Solano County repeat the state’s mistakes?

BY LILLIAN CHEN – April 14, 2012 In just two months, Solano County plans to begin construction of a $90 million jail. The new jail will add 362 beds and cost the state $62 million in ... See the original post: California – Op Ed: Addicted to Incarceration: Will Solano County repeat the state’s mistakes?

Read More
Default Image
  • 14
    Apr

Oakland police chief, Alameda County district attorney defend actions against Occupy Oakland

By Paul T. Rosynsky – Oakland Tribune – 04/13/2012 03:02:14 PM PDT EMERYVILLE — Law enforcement officials on Friday defended their ongoing reactions to the Occupy Oakland movement, while admitting some mistakes have been made as ... See the original post here: Oakland police chief, Alameda County district attorney defend actions against Occupy Oakland

Read More
Default Image
  • 14
    Apr

Oakland police chief, Alameda County district attorney defend actions against Occupy Oakland

By Paul T. Rosynsky – Oakland Tribune – 04/13/2012 03:02:14 PM PDT EMERYVILLE — Law enforcement officials on Friday defended their ongoing reactions to the Occupy Oakland movement, while admitting some mistakes have been made as ... Read more here: Oakland police chief, Alameda County district attorney defend actions against Occupy Oakland

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

Maryland – State lawmakers reverse high court ruling on public defenders

By Tricia Bishop, The Baltimore Sun – April 13, 2012 The Maryland General Assembly passed bills this month reversing a costly court of appeals ruling that would provide public defenders for indigent defendants at thousands of ... Visit link: Maryland – State lawmakers reverse high court ruling on public defenders

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

Federal District Court: New NLRA Poster Requirement Unlawful

A federal district court just ruled that the new National Labor Relations Act posting requirement is unlawful. At the present time, it is unclear... See the original post here: Federal District Court: New NLRA Poster Requirement Unlawful

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

Federal District Court: New NLRA Poster Requirement Unlawful

A federal district court just ruled that the new National Labor Relations Act posting requirement is unlawful. At the present time, it is unclear... See the article here: Federal District Court: New NLRA Poster Requirement Unlawful

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

Risky Mail: Concerns in Confidential Attorney-Client Email

Rebecca Bolin, Yale Law School Publication Date - Spring 2-2012 Abstract Early in the days of attorney-client email, David Hricik wrote a soothing law review article, Lawyers Worry Too Much About Transmitting Client Confidences By Internet E-mail, arguing that ... See the original post here: Risky Mail: Concerns in Confidential Attorney-Client Email

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

Risky Mail: Concerns in Confidential Attorney-Client Email

Rebecca Bolin, Yale Law School Publication Date - Spring 2-2012 Abstract Early in the days of attorney-client email, David Hricik wrote a soothing law review article, Lawyers Worry Too Much About Transmitting Client Confidences By Internet E-mail, arguing that ... See the rest here: Risky Mail: Concerns in Confidential Attorney-Client Email

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

On Video: The Brinker Decision’s Impact

Yesterday, HRWatchdog gave a brief summary of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, relating to meal and rest... See original here: On Video: The Brinker Decision's Impact

Read More
Default Image
  • 13
    Apr

On Video: The Brinker Decision’s Impact

Yesterday, HRWatchdog gave a brief summary of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, relating to meal and rest... Read the original here: On Video: The Brinker Decision's Impact

Read More

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and the District of Columbia.