D.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban — Creating Major Split with Ninth Circuit in Duncan v. Bonta

 

In a significant Second Amendment development, the Benson v. United States decision from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on so-called “large-capacity magazines,” ruling in a 2–1 decision that the restriction violates the Second Amendment.

The ruling carries national implications because it creates a direct conflict with the position taken by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California’s ongoing magazine ban litigation, Duncan v. Bonta.

With federal appellate courts now reaching opposite conclusions on the same constitutional question, the likelihood of review by the Supreme Court of the United States has increased substantially. The Court often steps in when circuit courts are divided on major constitutional issues.

Advocates note that this split could place Duncan on a fast track for Supreme Court review, potentially determining once and for all whether bans on standard-capacity magazines are consistent with the Second Amendment under the framework established in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

Supporters of the challenge, including the California Rifle & Pistol Association and the National Rifle Association, say the decision reinforces their longstanding argument that magazine bans cannot survive constitutional scrutiny.

 

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and the District of Columbia.