Default Image
  • 13
    Jan

MAPC Lawyers File Amicus Brief in Electronic Public Records Act Case

By C.D. Michel Michel & Associates filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief today in the California Court of Appeal, in support of the Sierra Club’s lawsuit against Orange County to obtain GIS parcel data under the California Public Records Act (PRA). The PRA is an invaluable tool that MAPC uses regularly on behalf of its clients...

Read More
Default Image
  • 7
    Jan

MAPC Lawsuit Sets Legal Precedents for Defending Hunter’s Rights

Although the case is still pending and a final ruling is yet to be issued, NRA's intervention on behalf of its members in the case Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al., has already resulted in several legal victories. CBD’s lawsuit, filed on January 27, 2009, alleges that the Bureau of Land Management...

Read More
Default Image
  • 5
    Jan

MAPC Lawyers Publish “What Didn’t Happen in 2010 for California Wage-and-Hour Laws”

by Joshua R. Dale and Tamara M. Rider Appellate decisions and legislation in the wage-and-hour field have, in recent years, resulted in significant changes in how wage-and-hour claims would be litigated. 2008, for example, brought the Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court(4th Dist.) 165 Cal. App. 4th 25 decision, which employers saw as a step back from an...

Read More
Default Image
  • 28
    Dec

APPEAL FILED IN LAWSUIT CHALLENGING SAN DIEGO CCW POLICIES

Acting quickly, on December 14, 2010, attorneys for the NRA, CRPA Foundation, and a number of San Diego residents filed a Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to overturn a Southern District Court ruling from December 10, 2010 that upheld San Diego Sheriff William Gore’s restrictive policies on issuing permits to carry concealed...

Read More
Default Image
  • 12
    Nov

NRA AND CRPA FOUNDATION SUBMIT COMMENTS OPPOSING CALIFORNIA DTSC PROPOSED REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT GREEN CHEMISTRY INITIATIVE

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has submitted its Proposed Regulations to the Office of Administrative Law that would implement the so-called "Green Chemistry Initiative." The submission begins the official rulemaking process, including the public comment period. To see the proposed regulations click here . Visit link: NRA AND CRPA FOUNDATION SUBMIT COMMENTS OPPOSING CALIFORNIA DTSC...

Read More
Default Image
  • 1
    Apr

A Major First Amendment Victory: AB 2571 Struck Down for Good

  Michel & Associates, P.C. is proud to celebrate a decisive and complete victory in Junior Shooting Sports Magazines, Inc. v. Bonta—a landmark challenge to California’s unconstitutional attempt to ban lawful communications about firearms, firearm-related products, and events allegedly “targeting minors.” Gavin Newsom signed California Assembly Bill 2571 in an effort that threatened junior shooting sports and sought...

Read More
Default Image
  • 19
    Mar

Rhode v. Bonta Heads to Ninth Circuit En Banc Panel: A Critical Moment for California’s Ammunition Rights

  After years of uncertainty for pro-Second Amendment cases before en banc panels in the Ninth Circuit, Rhode v. Bonta now heads into oral argument on March 25 in Pasadena before what may be the most favorable panel composition we could hope for. In a special edition of California Rifle & Pistol Association TV released this afternoon, Chuck...

Read More
Default Image
  • 11
    Mar

D.C. Appeals Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban — Creating Major Split with Ninth Circuit in Duncan v. Bonta

  In a significant Second Amendment development, the Benson v. United States decision from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on so-called “large-capacity magazines,” ruling in a 2–1 decision that the restriction violates the Second Amendment. The ruling carries national implications because it creates a direct conflict with the position taken...

Read More
Default Image
  • 10
    Mar

D.C. Court Strikes Down Magazine Ban — Paving the Way for California

  A federal appeals court has struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on “large-capacity magazines” in a 2-1 ruling in Benson v. United States, declaring that restrictions on magazines violate the Second Amendment. Why it matters to California gun owners: this decision creates a direct circuit split with the Ninth Circuit, which upheld California’s magazine ban in Duncan v....

Read More
Default Image
  • 9
    Mar

Sacramento’s Latest Anti-2A Push: SB 948 Targets Lawful Gun Owners. Again.

  After a relatively quiet start to the legislative session—perhaps in part due to California’s ongoing budget deficit crisis, the lull in anti-Second Amendment proposals was short-lived. In the latest episode of CRPA TV, California Rifle & Pistol Association Legislative Director Rick Travis breaks down SB 948, Sacramento’s newest attempt to burden lawful firearm owners with unrealistic and...

Read More
Default Image
  • 25
    Feb

Is SCOTUS Staying Silent on 2A Cases… or Is Something Bigger Brewing?

  After last Friday’s Supreme Court conference, several high-profile Second Amendment cases—like Duncan v. Bonta—were expected to appear on the order list. Yesterday, the Court’s order list did not include any of them. Does that mean “no news is good news,” or is time running out? Attorney Anna Barvir, who has worked extensively on Duncan v. Bonta, sees...

Read More
Default Image
  • 20
    Feb

Supreme Court Poised to Reshape the Second Amendment: Wolford v. Lopez Argued as Duncan v. Bonta Awaits Conference

  The current session of the Supreme Court of the United States is shaping up to be one of the most consequential for Second Amendment jurisprudence in decades—addressing not only who may exercise the right to keep and bear arms, but where those rights may be exercised. Soon, the Court may also take up the critical question of...

Read More
Default Image
  • 18
    Feb

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide the Future of the Second Amendment.

  History is unfolding before our eyes. An extraordinary number of Second Amendment cases are currently before the U.S. Supreme Court — either already argued, set for argument, or awaiting action on cert petitions. The decisions that come down in the next few weeks could redefine constitutional protections for generations. Here’s what to watch: Friday, February 20 –...

Read More
Default Image
  • 4
    Feb

Michel & Associates Amicus Brief in United States v. Hemani Challenges Federal Marijuana-Related Gun Ban

Michel & Associates, P.C. (MAPC) has assisted the Second Amendment Law Center (2ALC), California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA), the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and allied groups in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Hemani, a case challenging the federal government’s lifetime ban on firearm possession for marijuana users. “The historic...

Read More
Default Image
  • 29
    Jan

Olympic Champion Kim Rhode Talks Rhode v. Bonta and the Future of Second Amendment Litigation

Kim Rhode understands better than most that meaningful victories require patience, discipline, and relentless effort. A six-time Olympic medalist—crowned by a world-record performance at the London Games in 2012—Rhode is one of the most accomplished competitive shooters in history. She brings that same grit and determination to her advocacy for the Second Amendment. At last week’s SHOT Show,...

Read More

Contact Us

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT:  This communication or portions thereof may be considered "advertising" as defined by Section 6157(c) of the California Business and Professions Code or within the jurisdiction in which you are viewing this.  Nothing in the discussion above is intended to be a representation or guarantee about the outcome of any legal proceeding in which you may be involved.  By providing the information above in this format, Michel & Associates is not soliciting you to hire it to handle a specific legal matter you may currently have or be anticipating commencing in the future.  Notwithstanding the discussion above, you should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content on this site without seeking appropriate legal advice regarding your particular circumstances from an attorney licensed to practice law.  This communication is informational only and does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Michel & Associates.  Michel & Associates attorneys are licensed to practice in California, Florida, Nevada, Texas, and the District of Columbia.