-
Email[email protected]
-
Phone562-216-4444
Rodriguez v. City of San Jose
Case Name: Lori Rodriguez, The Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and Calguns Foundation, Inc. v. City of San Jose, City of San Jose Police Department, and Officer Steven Valentine
District Court Case No.: 5:15-cv-03698
Court of Appeal Case No.: 17-17144
Supreme Court of the United States Case No.: 19-1057
| Supreme Court of the United States |
||
| Filing Date | Filing Party | Document Description |
| 10/13/2020 | Court | Order Denying Petition for Certiorari |
| 10/13/2020 | Court | Order Granting Motion for Gun Owners of California to File Amicus Brief |
| 10/5/2020 | Court | Docket Text: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020. |
| 9/22/2020 | Petitioners | Reply in Support of Petition for Certiorari |
| 7/1/2020 | Court | Docket Text: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
| 6/17/2020 | Respondents | Brief in Opposition |
| 5/20/2020 | Amicus for Petitioners | Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief of Gun Owners of California, Inc., Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Heller Foundation, and Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund |
| 5/12/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 22, 2020. |
| 5/5/2020 | Respondents | Request for Extension to File Response Brief |
| 4/20/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Response Requested. (Due May 20, 2020) |
| 4/8/2020 | Court | Docket Text: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020. |
| 2/21/2020 | Petitioners | Petition for Writ of Certiorari |
| 12/12/2019 | Court | Docket Text: Application (19A653) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 21, 2020. |
| 12/11/2019 | Petitioners | Application for Extension to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari |
| United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
||
| Filing Date | Filing Party | Document Description |
| 2/27/2020 | Court | Supreme Court of the United States Notice regarding Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed |
| 12/16/2019 | Court | Supreme Court of the United States Letter regarding Application for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari |
| 10/2/2019 | Court | Mandate |
| 9/24/2019 | Court | Order Denying Petition for Rehearing |
| 9/18/2019 | Court | Docket Text: Appellant Calguns Foundation, Inc. in 17-17144 substituted by Appellant California Gun Rights Foundation, Inc in 17-17144 |
| 8/28/2019 | Appellants | Letter regarding Supplemental Authority People v. Ovieda and Community Care-Taking Exception to Fourth Amendment |
| 8/27/2019 | Appellants | Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing and/or Rehearing En Banc |
| 8/26/2019 | Appellees | Letter regarding Unavailability of Counsel |
| 8/22/2019 | Appellants | Unopposed Motion to Substitute Institutional Plaintiff After Name Change |
| 7/30/2019 | Court | Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing |
| 7/26/2019 | Appellants | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing |
| 7/23/2019 | Court | Memorandum |
| 7/23/2019 | Court | Opinion |
| 6/27/2019 | Appellants | Letter regarding Supplemental Authority Knick v. Township of Scott |
| 5/20/2019 | Appellants | Letter regarding Supplemental Authority Herrera v. Wyoming |
| 1/14/2019 | Court | Docket Text: ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND. |
| 1/9/2019 | Appellants | Letter Responding to Appellees’ Letter regarding Supplemental Authorities Pena and Wilson |
| 1/9/2019 | Appellees | Errata to Citation of Supplemental Authorities |
| 1/8/2019 | Appellees | Letter regarding Supplemental Authorities Pena v. Lindley and Wilson v. Lynch |
| 1/8/2019 | Appellants | Errata to Appellants’ Supplemental Brief |
| 1/7/2019 | Appellants | Supplemental Brief |
| 1/7/2019 | Appellees | Supplemental Brief of City of San Jose, San Jose Police Department, and Officer Steve Valentine |
| 1/7/2019 | Court | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew Pritchard for Appellees City of San Jose, SJPD and Steven Valentine. Date of service: 01/07/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) |
| 12/20/2018 | Court | Order to File Briefs regarding Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Doctrines of Preclusion |
| 12/10/2018 | Court | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Clifford S. Greenberg for Appellees City of San Jose, SJPD and Steven Valentine. Date of service: 12/10/2018. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) |
| 11/28/2018 | Appellants | Letter regarding Factual Errors on Oral Argument Notice |
| 11/7/2018 | Appellants | Acknowledgment of Hearing Notice |
| 11/7/2018 | Appellees | Acknowledgment of Hearing Notice |
| 11/4/2018 | Court | Docket Text: Notice of Oral Argument on Monday, January 14, 2019 – 09:30 A.M. – Courtroom 3 – San Francisco CA.View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.Be sure to review the GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to arrive (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).When you have reviewed the calendar, download the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form and within 21 days of Monday, January 14, 2019, file the completed form via Appellate CM/ECF. |
| 9/25/2018 | Appellants | Letter regarding Availability for Oral Argument |
| 9/24/2018 | Appellees | Letter regarding Availability for Oral Argument |
| 9/24/2018 | Court | Docket Text: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San FranciscoPlease review the San Francisco sitting dates for January 2019 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court within 3 days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: File Correspondence to Court; Subject: regarding availability for oral argument).When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: File Correspondence to Court; Subject: request for mediation). |
| 8/28/2018 | Appellees | Letter regarding Availability for Oral Argument |
| 8/28/2018 | Appellants | Letter regarding Availability for Oral Argument |
| 8/27/2018 | Court | Docket Text: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San FranciscoPlease review the San Francisco sitting dates for December 2018 and the two subsequent sitting months in that location at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please inform the court within 3 days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: File Correspondence to Court; Subject: regarding availability for oral argument).When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: File Correspondence to Court; Subject: request for mediation). |
| 7/16/2018 | Appellants | Appellants’ Reply Brief |
| 7/2/2018 | Amicus for Appellees | Amicus Brief of League of California Cities and International Municipal Lawyers Association |
| 7/2/2018 | Amicus for Appellees | Amicus Brief of The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence |
| 6/25/2018 | Appellees | Appellees’ Answering Brief |
| 3/21/2018 | Court | Order Granting Appellees’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief |
| 3/20/2018 | Appellees | Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief |
| 3/16/2018 | Court | Order Granting California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated’s Motion for Extension to File Amicus Brief |
| 3/6/2018 | Amicus for Appellants | Amicus Brief of California Rifle & Policy Association, Incorporated |
| 3/5/2018 | Amicus for Appellants | Amicus Brief of Millennial Policy Center |
| 2/26/2018 | Appellants | Appellants’ Opening Brief |
| 1/8/2018 | Court | Order Granting Motion to Extend Time for Briefing |
| 1/5/2018 | Appellants | Unopposed Motion and Notice to Extend Time for Briefing |
| 12/12/2017 | Court | Order regarding Case Not Selected for Mediation |
| 11/14/2017 | Appellants | Appellants’ Notice re: No Transcript Will Be Designated |
| 11/2/2017 | Appellants | Mediation Questionnaire |
| 10/25/2017 | Appellees | Notice of Appearance of Counsel Margo Laskowska |
| 10/20/2017 | Court | Case Docketing Notice and Time Schedule Order |
| United States District Court for the Northern District of California |
||
| Filing Date | Filing Party | Document Description |
| 10/20/2017 | Plaintiffs | Notice of Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit |
| 10/3/2017 | Court | Judgment |
| 9/29/2017 | Court | Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
| 8/15/2017 | Plaintiffs | Letter Brief regarding Supplemental Authority Panzella v. Sposato |
| 8/15/2017 | Defendants | Letter Brief regarding Supplemental Authority Panzella v. Sposato |
| 8/1/2017 | Court | Order re: Letter Brief of Supplemental Authority Panzella v. Sposato |
| 7/26/2017 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Notice of Supplemental Authority and Administrative Motion for Leave to Brief Development in Panzella v. Sposato |
| 5/30/2017 | Plaintiffs | Letter Brief regarding Supplemental Authority Nelson v. Colorado |
| 5/25/2017 | Defendants | Letter Brief regarding Supplemental Authority Nelson v. Colorado |
| 5/16/2017 | Court | Order re: Supplemental Authority Nelson v. Colorado |
| 5/8/2017 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Notice of Supplemental Authority and Administrative Motion for Leave to Brief Development in Nelson v. Colorado |
| 11/10/2016 | Court | Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Hon. Edward J. Davila: Motion Hearing held on 11/10/2016 re 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter under submission. Court to issue order. Plaintiff Attorney Don Kilmer. Defendant Attorney Clifford Greenberg. Total Time in Court:9:54-10:44am(50 Mins.) Court Reporter: Irene Rodriguez. This is a text only Minute Entry. |
| 10/7/2016 | Plaintiffs | Reply re: Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
| 9/30/2016 | Defendants | Reply and Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Summary Judgment
Moving Responsive Separate Statement of Material Facts and Evidence |
| 9/21/2016 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Errata Memorandum regarding Doc #36 |
| 9/20/2016 | Court | Order Granting Stipulation re: Extend Time for Plaintiffs’ Filing of Opposition and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
| 9/16/2016 | Court | Docket Text: ***CORRECTED/Reset Hearing as to 28 Opposition to Def’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 11/10/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. |
| 9/16/2016 | All Parties | Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiffs’ to File to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment |
| 9/16/2016 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Adjudication
Exhibit A to Declaration of Donald Kilmer Exhibit B to Declaration of Donald Kilmer Exhibit C to Declaration of Donald Kilmer Exhibit D to Declaration of Donald Kilmer Exhibit E to Declaration of Donald Kilmer Exhibit A to Declaration of Lori Rodriguez Exhibit B to Declaration of Lori Rodriguez Exhibit C to Declaration of Lori Rodriguez Exhibit D to Declaration of Lori Rodriguez |
| 9/14/2016 | Defendants | Notice of Errata to Table of Authorities in City’s Motion for Summary Judgment |
| 9/1/2016 | Defendants | Motion for Summary Judgment or In the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment |
| 4/29/2016 | Court | Order Granting Stipulation re: Doe Defendants |
| 4/28/2016 | All Parties | Stipulation re: Doe Defendants |
| 2/22/2016 | Court | Case Management Order |
| 2/16/2016 | All Parties | Joint Case Management Conference Statement |
| 2/11/2016 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Local Rule 3-15 Statement |
| 1/20/2016 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Certificate of Initial Disclosures |
| 1/20/2016 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ ADR Certification |
| 1/20/2016 | Defendants | Defendants’ ADR Certification |
| 1/11/2016 | Defendants | Defendants’ Answer to Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial |
| 11/4/2015 | Court | Docket Text: Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 2/18/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/25/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. |
| 11/4/2015 | Court | Order Granting Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Certification |
| 11/4/2015 | All Parties | Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Certification |
| 10/28/2015 | Court | Order Assigning Case to the Honorable Edward J. Davila |
| 10/28/2015 | Court | Docket Text: CLERK’S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. |
| 10/28/2015 | Defendants | Decline to Magistrate Judge |
| 10/21/2015 | All Parties | Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Certification |
| 10/21/2015 | Defendants | Waiver of the Service of Summons |
| 8/27/2015 | Plaintiffs | Consent to Magistrate Judge |
| 8/13/2015 | Court | Issued Summons |
| 8/13/2015 | Court | Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines |
| 8/13/2015 | Court | Docket Text: Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge’s standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court’s web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. |
| 8/12/2015 | Plaintiffs | Request for Summons |
| 8/12/2015 | Plaintiffs | Civil Cover Sheet |
| 8/12/2015 | Plaintiffs | Complaint |