-
Email[email protected]
-
Phone562-216-4444
Altman v. County of Santa Clara
Case Name: Janice Altman, Ryan Goodrich, Albert Lee Swann, Roman Kaplan, Yan Traytel, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC d.b.a. Eddy’s Shooting Sports, Second Amendment Foundation, California Gun Rights Foundation, National Rifle Association of America, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. v. County of Santa Clara, California, Laurie Smith, Jeffrey Rosen, Sara Cody, City of San Jose, California, Sam Liccardo, Edgardo Garcia, City of Mountain View, California, Max Bosel, County of Alameda, California, Gregory Ahern, Erica Pan, County of San Mateo, California, Carlos Bolanos, Scott Morrow, City of Pacifica, California, Dan Steidle, County of Contra Costa, California, David Livingston, Chris Farnitano, City of Pleasant Hill, California, Bryan Hill
District Court Case No.: 4:20-cv-02180
Court of Appeals Case No.: 21-15602
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
||
| Filing Date | Filing Party | Document Description |
| 1/13/2023 | Court | Mandate |
| 1/4/2023 | Court | Amended Memorandum |
| 12/28/2022 | Appellees | Letter Requesting Clarification on Memorandum |
| 12/27/2022 | Appellees | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Melissa R Kiniyalocts (Office of the County Counsel, 70 W. Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor, San Jose, CA 95110) for Appellee County of Santa Clara. Substitution for Attorney Jason M. Bussey for Appellees Sara H. Cody, County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey Rosen and Laurie Smith. Date of service: 12/27/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) |
| 12/22/2022 | Court | Memorandum Affirming |
| 11/16/2022 | Court | Docket Text: Filed Audio recording of oral argument. Note: Video recordings of public argument calendars are available on the Court’s website, at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ |
| 11/15/2022 | Court | Docket Text: ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, RICHARD A. PAEZ and DONALD W. MOLLOY. |
| 9/7/2022 | Appellants | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney George M. Lee for Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, NRA, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel. Hearing in San Francisco on 11/15/2022 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 20) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/07/2022. [12535468] [21-15602] (Lee, George) |
| 9/7/2022 | Appellees | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Melissa Kiniyalocts for Appellees Sara H. Cody, County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey Rosen and Laurie Smith. Hearing in San Francisco on 11/15/2022 at 09:00 A.M. (Courtroom: Courtroom 3). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 20) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/07/2022. [12534704] [21-15602] (Kiniyalocts, Melissa) |
| 9/4/2022 | Court | Docket Text: Notice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, November 15, 2022 – 09:00 A.M. – Courtroom 3 – Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA.The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location.View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case here.NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available here. At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk’s Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance.Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so.Be sure to review the GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible).If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Tuesday, November 15, 2022. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12533169]. [21-15602] (KS) |
| 7/29/2022 | Appellees | Response to Notice of Oral Argument |
| 7/28/2022 | Appellants | Response to Notice of Oral Argument |
| 7/27/2022 | Court | Docket Text: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San FranciscoPlease review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2022 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form’s instructions carefully.When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date.If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice, using CM/ECF (Type of Document: Correspondence to Court; Subject: request for mediation). |
| 7/6/2022 | Appellees | Notice of Supplemental Authority 28(j) Letter regarding Brach v. Newsom |
| 3/8/2022 | Court | Order Holding Appeal in Abeyance Pending Issuance of Mandate in McDougall v. County of Ventura |
| 1/21/2022 | Appellants | Notice of Supplemental Authorities |
| 12/31/2021 | Appellants | Appellants’ Reply Brief |
| 11/15/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Streamlined request [18] by Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, National Rifle Association of America, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 01/03/2022. |
| 11/15/2021 | Appellants | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, National Rifle Association of America, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel. New requested due date is 12/17/2021. |
| 11/12/2021 | Appellees | Answering Brief |
| 9/28/2021 | Court | Order Granting Extension of Time to File Answering Brief |
| 9/28/2021 | Appellees | Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief |
| 8/19/2021 | Appellees | Docket Text: Streamlined request [11] by Appellees Sara H. Cody, County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey Rosen and Laurie Smith to extend time to file the brief is approved FOR ALL APPELLEES. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees Carlos Bolanos, Max Bosel, City of Mountain View, City of Pacifica, City of Pleasant Hill, City of San Jose, Sara H. Cody, County of Contra Costa, County of San Mateo, County of Santa Clara, Chris Farnitano, Edgardo Garcia, Bryan Hill, Sam Liccardo, David Livingston, Scott Morrow, Jeffrey Rosen, Laurie Smith and Daniel Steidle answering brief due 10/12/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. |
| 8/19/2021 | Appellees | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Sara H. Cody, County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey Rosen and Laurie Smith. New requested due date is 10/12/2021. |
| 8/11/2021 | Appellants | Appellants’ Opening Brief |
| 6/28/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Streamlined request [6] by Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, National Rifle Association of America, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, National Rifle Association of America, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel opening brief due 08/11/2021. Appellees Carlos Bolanos, Max Bosel, City of Mountain View, City of Pacifica, City of Pleasant Hill, City of San Jose, Sara H. Cody, County of Contra Costa, County of San Mateo, County of Santa Clara, Chris Farnitano, Edgardo Garcia, Bryan Hill, Sam Liccardo, David Livingston, Scott Morrow, Jeffrey Rosen, Laurie Smith and Daniel Steidle answering brief due 09/10/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. |
| 6/28/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Janice Altman, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation, Scott Chalmers, City Arms East LLC, City Arms LLC, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, National Rifle Association of America, Second Amendment Foundation, Albert Lee Swann and Yan Traytel. New requested due date is 08/11/2021. |
| 5/3/2021 | Court | Order Releasing Case from Mediation |
| 4/19/2021 | Court | Mediation Order |
| 4/12/2021 | Court | Docket Text: The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/12/2021.To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following link. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. |
| 4/12/2021 | Appellants | Mediation Questionnaire |
| 4/5/2021 | Court | Time Schedule Order |
| U.S. District Court, Northern District |
||
| Filing Date | Filing Party | Document Description |
| 4/14/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Transcript of Proceedings held on 05/20/2020, before Judge Tigar. Court Reporter Pamela Batalo Hebel, telephone number 626-688-7509; [email protected]. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk’s Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. (Re 98 Transcript Order,, ) Redaction Request due 5/5/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/17/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/13/2021. |
| 4/2/2021 | Plaintiffs | Transcript Order Form |
| 4/2/2021 | Plaintiffs | Notice of Appeal |
| 3/24/2021 | Court | Order Dismissing Alameda County Defendants and Plaintiffs |
| 3/23/2021 | All Parties | Joint Motion for Dismissal of Alameda County Defendants and Plaintiffs |
| 2/26/2021 | Court | Scheduling Order |
| 2/23/2021 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order re Scheduling Order |
| 2/16/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jon S. Tigar: Further Case Management Conference held on 2/16/2021. Hearing held via Zoom videoconference. The parties are ordered to meet and confer about, and make a joint proposal regarding, the case schedule. If the parties are unable to agree, they must submit competing proposals. In the latter event, the Court will endeavor to choose, in all respects, the single proposal it concludes is most reasonable. Joint or Competing proposals due by 2/23/2021.Total Time in Court: 12 minutes. Court Reporter: not reported. Plaintiff Attorney: George M. Lee, Raymond M. DiGuiseppe. Defendant Attorney: Matthew D. Zinn, Andrew Miller. |
| 2/9/2021 | Court | Docket Text: Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: Counsel is instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials JST immediately after the case number. Re: 91 J oint Case Management Statement, filed by Albert Lee Swann, City Arms LLC, Scott Chalmers, Yan Traytel, Ryan Goodrich, Roman Kaplan, Firearms Policy Coalition, Cuckoo Collectibles LLC d.b.a. Eddy’s Shooting Sports, California Gun Rights Foundation, Inc., National Rifle Association of America, Janice Altman, Dmitri Danilevsky, Greg David, Second Amendment Foundation, California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees Inc, City Arms East LLC |
| 2/9/2021 | All Parties | Joint Case Management Statement and Rule 26(f) Report |
| 1/20/2021 | Court | Docket Text: CLERK’S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Case Management Statement due by 2/9/2021. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/16/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, – Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is r equired of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at [email protected] no later than February 12, 2020 by Noon.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. C ase Management Statement due by 2/9/2021. Further Case Management Conference set for 2/16/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, – Videoconference Only. |
| 1/20/2021 | Court | Order Granting Stipulation to Continue Initial Case Management Conference |
| 1/19/2021 | Defendants | Notice of Automatic Substitution of Nicholas Moss for Defendant Erica Pan |
| 1/19/2021 | Defendants | Defendants County of Alameda, Gregory J. Ahern, and Nicholas Moss’s Answer to First Amended Complaint |
| 1/19/2021 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Initial Case Management Conference |
| 12/31/2020 | Court | Order regarding Case Management |
| 12/28/2020 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order regarding Case Management |
| 12/21/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2021 02:00 PM in Oakland, – Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be i dentified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel for all parties must be sent in one mail to the CRD at [email protected] no later than January 11, 2020 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2021 0 2:00 PM in Oakland, – Videoconference Only. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. |
| 12/7/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Andrew P. Miller for Defendants |
| 12/4/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Matthew D. Zinn for Defendants |
| 11/30/2020 | Court | Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss |
| 11/27/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Statement of Recent Decision relevant to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint |
| 11/10/2020 | Court | Order Continuing Case Management Conference |
| 11/6/2020 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Case Management Conference |
| 9/15/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Statement of Recent Decision Relevant to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants County of Alameda’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint |
| 9/14/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Per Order 74 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Case Management Statement due by 11/10/2020. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/17/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020) (Entered: 09/14/2020) |
| 9/14/2020 | Court | Docket Text: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCEThe parties’ stipulated request to continue the case management conference currently set for September 15, 2020, is granted. The conference is continued to November 17, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. An updated joint case management statement is due November 10, 2020. The parties may request that the conference be advanced if appropriate. (Entered by Judge Jon S. Tigar) |
| 9/14/2020 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue Initial Case Management Conference |
| 9/11/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/15/2020 02:00 PM. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jst Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names of all counsel for both parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at [email protected] no later than September 14, 2020 by 2:00 p.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/15/2020 02:00 PM. |
| 8/7/2020 | Court | Order Vacating Hearing |
| 8/7/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 8/12/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Jon S. Tigar. For Zoom connection, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/This proceeding will be a Zoom video conferencing webinar. ADVANCE REGISTRATION OF PARTICIPATING COUNSEL IS REQUIRED and must be done by emailing ONE list of names and emails of counsel who will be participating in the hearing to [email protected] by no later than August 11, 2020 by 2:00 P.M. PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III.Case participants may also receive an email invitation from the court with different information which should be followed.All counsel, members of the public and press please click the link or use the information below to join the webinar: https://cand-uscourts.zoomgov.com/j/1619067542?pwd=YktBS2VoNm1JYW9xMS91dk9rUzZudz09Meeting ID: 161 906 7542Password: 959588Dial by your location+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)+1 253 215 8782 US+1 301 715 8592 US+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/ac4JkPfcjoFor important information and guidance on technical preparation, please see https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 8/12/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Jon S. Tigar. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. |
| 7/22/2020 | Defendants | Defendants’ Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint |
| 7/15/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Opposition to County of Alameda’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint |
| 7/1/2020 | Defendants | Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint |
| 6/25/2020 | Court | Order Continuing Deadline to File Responsive Pleadings and Date for Case Management Conference |
| 6/23/2020 | All Parties | Administrative Motion re: Date for Responsive Pleadings, Case Management Conference, and Joint Case Management Conference Statement |
| 6/18/2020 | Court | Order of Dismissal |
| 6/17/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 63 Administrative Motion for Clarification of Court’s Order ECF No. 61. The Court will enter an order of dismissal by separate order. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 17, 2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. |
| 6/12/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion for Clarification of Court’s Order |
| 6/2/2020 | Court | Order Denying Preliminary Injunction |
| 6/2/2020 | Defendant | Defendant County of Contra Costa’s Request for Judicial Notice of June 2, 2020 Amendment to Contra Costa County’s Public Health Order |
| 6/1/2020 | Defendant | Defendant County of Santa Clara’s Request for Judicial Notice of June 1, 2020 Amendment to Santa Clara County’s Public Health Order |
| 5/29/2020 | Defendant | Defendant County of San Mateo’s Request for Judicial Notice of Issuance of Revised Health Officer Order |
| 5/29/2020 | Plaintiffs | Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
Supplemental Declaration of Roman Kaplan in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| 5/27/2020 | Defendants | Defendants’ Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Brief |
| 5/22/2020 | Plaintiffs | Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| 5/20/2020 | Court | Minutes for Hearing on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction |
| 5/19/2020 | Court | Docket Text: ORDER The Court will allocate one hour for oral argument on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 20. Each side may argue for up to 30 minutes, including time spent answering questions from the Court. Each side will be allowed to make an opening and a rebuttal argument, with Plaintiffs going first. Any side wishing to save time for rebuttal should avoid using all its time during opening argument; the Court will not “reserve” time. Defendants should determine in advance how they will divide up their time among them or, alternatively, whether they will permit counsel for one of them to argue for all of them. Each side should also address the effect, if any, of the modified orders attached to Defendants’ supplemental request for judicial notice, ECF No. 50, including whether supplemental briefing is required and whether this case is now moot. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Entered by Judge Jon S. Tigar) (Filed on 5/19/2020) (Entered: 05/19/2020) |
| 5/19/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERK’S NOTICE REGARDING MAY 20, 2020 HEARING. This link is for public use only; the parties will receive personal invites to attend the hearing. Please use the options below to access the hearing. Important: Any recording of a court proceeding held by video or teleconference, including screen-shots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court-issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. Zoom webinar: When: May 20, 2020 02:00 PM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Topic: Altman et al v. County of Santa Clara et al Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85710616565?pwd=UlFvaTRiSWNKWCtkeGpFV0RMc3NTdz09Password: 029287Or Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 929 205 6099 or +1 253 215 8782 Webinar ID: 857 1061 6565 Password: 029287 (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2020) (Entered: 05/19/2020) |
| 5/19/2020 | Defendant | Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants’ Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction |
| 5/18/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. For Zoom connection, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/This proceeding will be a Zoom video conferencing webinar. ADVANCE REGISTRATION OF PARTICIPATING COUNSEL IS REQUIRED and must be done by emailing a list of names and emails of counsel who will be participating in the hearing to [email protected] by no later than May 19, 2020 by 2:00 PM.Case participants may also receive an email invitation from the court with different information which should be followed.A notice with the dial in information will be posted for members of the public and press prior to the hearing.For important information and guidance on technical preparation, please see https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2020) (Entered: 05/18/2020) |
| 5/8/2020 | Plaintiffs | Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| 5/1/2020 | Defendants | Defendants’ Joint Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction |
| 4/22/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Krishan S. Chopra |
| 4/22/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Hannah Kierschnick |
| 4/22/2020 | Court | Docket Text: per order 43 Set/Reset Deadlines as to 20 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order or in the Alternative, Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 5/1/2020. Replies due by 5/8/2020. Motion Hearing set for 5/20/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. |
| 4/21/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Order by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 42 Stipulation. A single consolidated opposition brief is due at 5 p.m. May 1, 2020. Plaintiffs’ reply brief is due at 5 p.m. May 8, 2020. The hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction, ECF No. 20, is continued to May 20, 2020. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 21, 2020. |
| 4/21/2020 | All Parties | Stipulation and Proposed Order re Filing Consolidated Opposition and Reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| 4/21/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Margo Laskowska |
| 4/20/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Raymond L. MacKay |
| 4/20/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Lance Bayer |
| 4/20/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Kristin Chopra |
| 4/18/2020 | Court | Docket Text: ORDER To avoid duplication of argument and conserve the parties’ and the Court’s resources, the Court orders the parties to meet and confer regarding the filing of a single consolidated opposition brief to Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. By 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020, the parties shall file a joint or competing proposals for such a brief, including its page length, as well as any resulting modifications to the length of Plaintiffs’ reply brief. In their proposal(s), the parties may also request a continuance of up to one week for the briefing and hearing deadlines. |
| 4/17/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Gene Tanaka |
| 4/17/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorneys Thomas L. Geiger and Patrick L. Hurley |
| 4/17/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Kevin D. Siegel |
| 4/17/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Michelle M. Kenyon |
| 4/16/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Sarah H. Trela |
| 4/16/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Daniel McCloskey |
| 4/16/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Douglas M. Press |
| 4/16/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Melissa R. Kiniyalocts |
| 4/16/2020 | Defendants | Notice of Appearance of Attorney Jason M. Bussey |
| 4/13/2020 | Plaintiffs | Supplemental Declaration of George M. Lee re Service of Plaintiffs’ Application for Temporary Restraining Order, and/or in the Alternative, Motion for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction |
| 4/13/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Per Order Set/Reset Deadlines as to MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order or in the Alternative, Preliminary Injunction. Responses due by 4/24/2020. Replies due by 5/1/2020. Motion Hearing set for 5/13/2020 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 6, 2nd Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. |
| 4/11/2020 | Court | Docket Text: ORDER Plaintiffs have filed a notice of withdrawal of counsel and included a proposed order. ECF No. 18. Because Plaintiffs remain represented by other attorneys, the Court construes the notice as a Rule 5(1)(c)(2)(C) notice of change in counsel, which is effective without a court order. The Clerk is directed to remove John W. Dillon from the docket. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 11, 2020. |
| 4/10/2020 | Court | Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order; Scheduling Order re Application for Preliminary Injunction |
| 4/10/2020 | Plaintiffs | Appearance of Counsel for Plaintiffs, Raymond M. DiGuiseppe |
| 4/10/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Application for Temporary Restraining Order, and/or in the Alternative, Motion for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction
Proposed Temporary Restraining Order and Issuance of Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction |
| 4/10/2020 | Plaintiffs | First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief |
| 4/8/2020 | Plaintiffs | Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel John W. Dillon
Proposed Order regarding Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel John W. Dillon |
| 4/6/2020 | Court | Order Granting Adam Kraut’s Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice |
| 4/3/2020 | Court | Clerk’s Notice Setting Case Management Conference |
| 4/3/2020 | Court | Order Reassigning Case |
| 4/2/2020 | Court | Order of Recusal |
| 4/2/2020 | Plaintiffs | Adam Kraut’s Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice |
| 4/2/2020 | Court | Order Reassigning Case |
| 4/2/2020 | Court | Docket Text: This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. |
| 4/2/2020 | Court | Docket Text: CLERK’S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. |
| 4/2/2020 | Plaintiffs | Plaintiffs’ Certification of Interested Entities or Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement |
| 4/2/2020 | Plaintiffs | Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction |
| 4/2/2020 | Court | Issued Summons |
| 4/1/2020 | Court | Order Reassigning Case |
| 4/1/2020 | Court | Order of Recusal |
| 3/31/2020 | Court | Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines |
| 3/31/2020 | Court | Docket Text: Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge’s standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court’s web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. |
| 3/31/2020 | Plaintiffs | Summons |
| 3/31/2020 | Plaintiffs | Civil Case Cover Sheet |
| 3/31/2020 | Plaintiffs | Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief |