Nichols v. Brown et al.

Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-55873 Docketed: 05/29/2014
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles

Originating Court Information:
District: 0973-2 : 2:11-cv-09916-SJO-SS
Trial Judge: S. James Otero, District Judge
Date Filed: 11/30/2011

​

Date Filing Party Document
    Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
5/5/2018  Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re Illinois v. Chairez

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Illinois v. Chairez
5/4/2018 Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Sessions v. Dimaya

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Sessions v. Dimaya
3/9/2018 Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Gonzalez 
2/27/2018 Court  Order re Submission of Case Vacated Pending Issuance of Decision in Young v. State Hawaii
2/16/2018  Court   Oral Argument
1/8/2018  Applellant  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Notice of Assembly Bill 424 Possession of a Firearm in a School Zone

Attachment to Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Notice of Assembly Bill 424 Possession of a Firearm in a School Zone
1/8/2018  Appellant  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Notice of Amendment to California Penal Code Section 26400

Attachment to Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Notice of Amendment to California Penal Code Section 26400
1/8/2018  Appellant  Plaintiff-Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Zuckerman

Attachment 1 to Plaintiff-Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Zuckerman

Attachment 2 to Plaintiff-Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Zuckerman

Attachment 3 to Plaintiff-Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Zuckerman

Attachment 4 to Plaintiff-Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Zuckerman
12/31/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Wrenn v. District of Columbia

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Wrenn v. District of Columbia
12/11/2017  Appellee  Acknowledgment of Hearing for Attorney Jonathan Eisenberg on Behalf of Appellees
12/7/2017  Appellant  Acknowledgment of Hearing for Charles Nichols on Behalf of Appellant
11/18/2017 Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Schmitz
11/17/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Casares
11/17/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re In Re Jaime
10/21/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Packingham v. North Carolina
10/13/2017  Appellee  Appellees Letter to Court re Possible Oral Argument Dates
10/10/2017  Court  Order re Denying En Banc Hearing
7/21/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Romero v. Evans

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Auhtority re Romer v. Evans
7/19/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re California Government Code Sections of the California Emergency Services Act

 
7/14/2017  Appellant  Reply to Objection to Report of Recommendation

Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Response to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Objections to U.S. Magistrate Report and Recommendations
7/10/2017  Appellant Appellants Response to Appellees July 7 2017 Letter
7/7/2017  Appellee  Appellees Letter to Court re Right to Carry Laws
7/7/2017  Appellant  Appellants Citation of Supplemental Authority re People v. King 
7/6/2017  Appellant  Appellants Citation of Supplemental Authority re People v. McDonnell
7/5/2017  Appellant Notice of Supplemental Authority re Parker v. District of Columbia

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Parker v. District of Columbia
7/4/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Parker v. District of Columbia

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Parker v. District of Columbia
7/4/2017  Appellant  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols Motion to Schedule Oral Argument with Related Case
7/2/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Bauer v. Becerra 

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Bauer v. Becerra
7/1/2017  Appellant  Errata to Notice of Supplemental Authority
7/1/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Duncan v. Becerra

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Duncan v. Becerra
6/29/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Hughes v. Kisela

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Hughes v. Kisela
6/21/2017  Appellant  Plaintiff Appellant Nichols’ Notice of Related Case
6/21/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re McCalip v. Ted Conferences

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re McCalip v. Ted Conferences
6/20/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Beckles v. US
6/17/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re US v. Gamboa 
6/15/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re A Practical Treatise on the Criminal Law Volume 3

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re A Practical Treatise on the Criminal Law Volume 3
6/12/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Fisher v. Kealoha

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Fisher v. Kealoha
5/30/2017  Appellant   Notice of Supplemental Authority re Duffie v. City of Lincoln

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Duffie v. City of Lincoln
5/22/2017  Appellant  Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Voisine v. US_68-1 
5/22/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Roundtable Areas of the Constitutional Doctrine
5/21/2017  Appellant   Notice of Supplemental Authority re Keller v. Keller

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Keller v. Keller
5/15/2017  Appellant  Notice of Supplemental Authority re Pinner v. Indiana

Attachment to Notice of Supplemental Authority re Pinner v. Indiana
4/6/2017  Appellee  Appellees Response to Citation of Supplemental Authority re Flanagan v. Harris 
4/6/2017  Appellee  Appellees Response to Citation of Supplemental Authority re Norma v. Florida 
3/20/2017  Court No judge has requested a vote to hear this case initially en banc within the time allowed by General Order 5.2a. The request is therefore denied.
3/17/2017 Appellant  Citation of Supplemental Authority re Wisconsin Carry Inc. v City of Madison 2017 WI 19 – FRAP 28j 

Order re Citation of Supplemental Authority re Wisconsin Carry Inc. v City of Madison 2017 WI 19 – FRAP 28j
3/17/2017  Appellant  Citation of Supplemental Authority re Flanagan et al v Harris et al – FRAP 28J

Order re Citation of Supplemental Authority re Flanagan et al v Harris et al – FRAP 28J
3/17/2017 Appellant Citation of Supplemental Authority re Dale Lee Norman v. Florida SC15-6501 – FRAP 28J 

Opinion re Citation of Supplemental Authority re Dale Lee Norman v. Florida SC15-6501 – FRAP 28J
3/17/2017  Appellant  Citation of Supplemental Authority re Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha et al – 12-16258 28J 

Order re Christopher Baker v. Louis Kealoha et al – 12-16258 28J
3/13/2017  Court  Received 7 paper copies of Amicus Brief [ # 44 ] filed by Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 
3/9/2017  Court  Received 7 paper copies of Amicus Brief [ # 41 ] filed by Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 
3/9/2017 Court Received 7 paper copies of Amicus Brief [ # 42 ] filed by Everytown for Gun Safety. 
3/6/2017  Court  Filed 4 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 48 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Charles Nichols.
3/6/2017  Court Order Referring Several Motions for Leave to File Amicus Briefs 
3/6/2017  Court Received 7 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 49 ] filed by Charles Nichols. 
3/2/2017  Plaintiff Citation of Supplemental Authority re Willis v. Fresno No. 14-16560 
3/1/2017  Court  Order Requesting Hard Copies of Reply Brief 
3/1/2017  Plaintiff  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols Reply Brief 
3/1/2017  Plaintiff  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols Supplemental Excerpts of Record
2/27/2017  Court  Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.  
2/27/2017  Court  Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.  
2/27/2017  Court  Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending Everytown for Gun Safety. 
2/24/2017   Amicus  Brief of Amicus Curiae Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in Support of Appellees and Affirmance
2/24/2017   Amicus  Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence In Support of Appellees and Affirmance 
2/24/2017   Amicus Brief of Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety In Support of Appellees and Affirmance 
2/24/2017  Amicus Motion for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees 
2/24/2017  Amicus  Brief for Amicus Curiae Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence In Support of Defendants-Appellees and In Support of Affirmance 
2/24/2017  Amicus  Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief In Support of Defendants-Appellees 
2/23/2017  Court  Filed 4 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 35 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellees Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris.  
2/23/2017  Court  Received 7 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 36 ] filed by Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris.  
2/22/2017  Court  Streamlined request [38] by Appellant Charles Nichols to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 04/03/2017.
2/22/2017  Court  Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Charles Nichols. New requested due date is 04/03/2017.  
2/21/2017  Court Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 36 ] submitted by Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate CM/ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [ # 35 ] submitted by Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6.  
2/17/2017  Appellee  Appellees Addenum 
2/17/2017  Appellee  Appellees Brief 
2/16/2017 Appellee  Appellees Supplemental Excerpts of Record 
1/18/2017  Court  Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner Appellees opposed late motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 32 ]) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due February 17, 2017. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. Appellants request (Docket Entry No. [ # 33 ]) for sanctions is denied. Appellants petition for rehearing en banc (Docket Entry No. [ # 31 ]) will be addressed in a separate order.  
12/20/2016  Appellant  Appellant’s Opposition to Appellees’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief and Request for FRAP31-2.3 Sanctions 
12/16/2016  Appellee  Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief 
12/14/2016  Appellant Appellant’s Petition for Appeal to Be Heard Initially En Banc 
11/16/2016  Court  Received 7 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 26 ] filed by Charles Nichols.  
11/15/2016  Court Filed 4 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 27 ] in 2 volume(s) filed by Appellant Charles Nichols. 
11/9/2016  Court  Order Requesting Hard Copies of Appellant’s Brief
11/9/2016  Appellant  Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Excerpts of Record Volume 1 

Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Excerpts of Record Volume 2
11/9/2016  Appellant  Appellant’s Opening Brief 

Addendum
7/22/2016 Court Order Granting Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Further Stay Appellate Proceedings
7/17/2016 Appellant Status Report
7/17/2016 Appellant Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 and Richards
4/5/2016 Court Order Granting Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Further Stay Appellate Proceedings
3/17/2016 Appellant Status Report
3/17/2016 Appellant Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 and Richards
2/4/2016 Court Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
1/20/2016 Appellant Status Report
1/20/2016 Appellant Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
11/9/2015 Court Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
10/8/2015 Appellant Status Report
10/8/2015 Appellant Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
7/21/2015 Court Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
7/17/2015 Appellant Status Report
7/17/2015 Appellant Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
4/13/2015 Court Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Until June 30, 2015
4/9/2015  Appellee  Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Until June 30, 2015
1/21/2015 Court Filed order (Appellate Commissioner):Appellants motion to file sur-reply in opposition to appellees motion to stay proceedings is granted. Appellants sur-reply and the previously submitted filings concerning the motion to stay proceedings have been considered. Appellees opposed motion to stay proceedings pending the courts ruling whether to grant the petition for en banc review in Richards v. Prieto, No. 11-16255 is granted. Within 90 days after the date of this order or within 14 days after the court rules on the petition for en banc review in Richards, whichever occurs first, appellees shall file an appropriate motion addressing the status of this appeal and requesting a further stay or other relief. Appellants motion to file an oversized opening brief is granted in part. Appellant may file an opening brief that does not exceed 18,000 words. The opening brief is due within 14 days after the stay granted in the preceding paragraph (or any subsequent stay) expires. Appellants unopposed motion for an extension to file a shortened opening brief is granted. The answering brief is due within 45 days after the stay expires. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief.
12/24/2014 Court Streamlined request [9] by Appellees Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 32-2.[9362274] (GS) [Entered: 12/24/2014 04:17 PM]
12/24/2014 Appellee Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Kamala D. Harris and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.. New requested due date is 01/30/2015. [9361612] [14-55873] (JME) [Entered: 12/24/2014 11:24 AM]
12/15/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Sur-Reply In Opposition to Appellee’s Motion to Stay Proceedings
12/15/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Motion to File Sur-Reply In Opposition to Defendant-Appellee Kamala Harris’ Motion to Stay Proceedings
12/8/2014 Appellee Reply In Support of Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
12/1/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation to Opening Brief Declaration of Charles Nicols
12/1/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Addendum to Opening Brief Addendum
12/1/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Opening Brief Addendum Certificate of Service
11/29/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Opposition to Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
11/23/2014 Appellant Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief; Declaration of Charles Nichols
11/19/2014 Appellee Appellees Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
10/16/2014 Court Order Granting Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief
5/29/2014 Court Court of Appeal Time Schedule Order
5/27/2014 Appellant Notice of Appeal
5/1/2014 Court Judgment
5/1/2014 Court Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
4/14/2014 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Response to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Objection to U.S. Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation
4/11/2014 Court Notice of Discrepancy and Order
3/31/2014 Plaintiff Plaintiff Nichols’ Objection and Opposition to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
3/18/2014 Court Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
3/18/2014 Court NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2014. (mr) (Entered: 03/18/2014)
2/5/2014 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re US v. Cureton No. 12-1250 & 12-1251
2/5/2014 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority
2/3/2014 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Harris’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority [Dkt #157]
1/28/2014 Defendant Further Objections to Supplemental Filings
1/13/2014 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Re Notice of Supplemental Authority re Morris v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1/13/2014 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re Morris v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1/10/2014 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Re Notice of Supplemental Authority re Illinois Association of Firearm Retailers v. City of Chicago
1/10/2014 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re Benson v. City of Chicago
1/6/2014 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority re Patel v. City of Los Angeles
1/6/2014 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Harris’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority [Dkt #149]
1/6/2014 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re Patel v. City of Los Angeles
12/27/2013 Defendant Objection to Supplemental Filing
12/13/2013 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols re Notice of Supplemental Authority
12/13/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re Sylvester v. Harris
12/9/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Charles Nichols’ Objection to Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes [Dkt #140 -2]
12/9/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Charles Nichols’ Objection to Defendant Harris’ Errata Filing(s)
12/9/2013 Defendant Plaintiff Charles Nichols’ Reply to Defendant Harris’ Statement of Genuine Disputes [Dkt #140-1]
12/9/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Charles Nichols Reply to Defendant Harris’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt #140]
12/3/2013 Defendant Reply In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12
12/3/2013 Defendant Corrected Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
12/3/2013 Defendant Notice of Errata to Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
12/2/2013 Defendant Statement of Genuine Disputes
12/2/2013 Defendant Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes
12/2/2013 Defendant Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/26/2013 Defendant Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes
11/26/2013 Defendant Statement of Genuine Disputes
11/26/2013 Defendant Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/26/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
11/26/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Nichols Objection to Evidence
11/18/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, On November 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which was entered on the Courts docket on November 15, 2013. (Dkt. No. 131). The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Defendants Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment 131 .
11/13/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: (1) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND (2) VACATING HEARING DATE (Dkt. No. 129 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Defendant’s Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. If Plaintiff does not intend to oppose the Motion, he may request a voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). A Notice of Dismissal form is attached for Plaintiff’s convenience. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal Form)
11/12/2013 Defendant Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
11/12/2013 Defendant Memoradum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12
11/12/2013 Defendant Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C)
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Nichols’ Notice of Lodging of Proposed Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; Evidence In Support
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff Nichols’ Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Exhibits A Through H In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Declaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols In Support of His Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
10/15/2013 Court Nichols v. Brown_Order Staying Appeal Pending Richards, Peruta & Baker
10/3/2013 Court Received original and 7 copies reply brief of Appellant Charles Nichols (Informal: No) 37 pages. Served on 09/17/2013. Major deficiencies: brief is oversize. Notified appellant.
10/3/2013 Appellant Appellant’s Motion to File Oversize Reply Brief
9/25/2013 Court Plaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Reply to Motion of CRPA Foundation for Leave to File Amicus Brief and to Participate In Oral Argument
9/25/2013  Court Order Referring CRPA Foundation’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief to Merits Panel
9/23/2013  Respondent Response of Kamala Harris to Motion of CRPA Foundation for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and to Participate in Oral Argument 
9/12/2013  Court Order re Supplemental Excerpts of Record 
9/12/2013  Court Filed Appellee Kamala D. Harris paper copies of excerpts of record [17] in 3 volume(s). [8780157] (WP)
9/12/2013  Appellant  Supplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 3 
9/12/2013  Appellant Supplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 2
9/12/2013  Appellant Supplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 1
9/11/2013  Amici Motion of CRPA Foundation For Leave of Court to File Amicus Curiae Brief and To Participate In Oral Argument
9/11/2013 Court COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Refiled using correct ECF event. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [20]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) California Rifle & Pistol Association Foundation Motion to become amicus curiae. Date of service: 09/11/2013. [8778925] (CDM)
9/9/2013  Court Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [13] filed by Kamala D. Harris. [8776535] (SD)
9/5/2013  Court Order re Answering Brief 
9/4/2013 Appellant  Brief of Respondent California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
9/4/2013 Appellant  Appellant’s Reply Brief
8/15/2013 Court Order Granting CRPA Foundation’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief
8/7/2013 Court Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending CRPA Foundation. [8735109] (EL)
8/7/2013 Amicus Curiae CRPA Proposed Amicus Curiae’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief
8/7/2013 Appellant Notice of Entitlement to Priority Hearing
8/6/2013 Plaintiff Nichols’ Opening Brief
8/2/2013 Court Ninth Circuit Order Denying Motion to Expedite Preliminary Injunction Appeal
7/29/2013 Defendant Defendant Kamala Harris’s Case Status Report
7/18/2013 Court Order Denying Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/16/2013 Defendant Opposition of Defendant City of RB to Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Memorandum, Reasons and Points of Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order Staying Further District Court Proceedings
7/12/2013 Plaintiff Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Potential Mootness Against City of Redondo Beach
7/10/2013 Court Court of Appeal briefing schedule
7/9/2013 Court Notification by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13-56203 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
7/8/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal Re Preliminary Injunction
7/3/2013 Court Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
6/12/2013 Court Scheduling Order
6/3/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice and Reply to Defendant Kamala Harris’s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
6/3/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Reply to Kamala Harris’s Opposition to Charles Nichols’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/28/2013 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’ Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/16/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant City of Redondo Beach’s Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Declaration Submitted In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
5/16/2013 Court Minute Order Striking Defendants Opposition and Plaintiffs Reply
5/7/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice and Reply to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
5/7/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichol’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/7/2013 Defendant Defendant City of Redondo Beach’s Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Declaration Submitted In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
5/7/2013 Defendant Defendant City of Redondo Beach Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion to Dismiss Second and Third Claims In The Second Amended Complaint; Declaration of T. Peter Pierce In Support
5/7/2013 Defendant Defendant City of Redondo Beach Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Second and Third Claims In The Second Amended Complaint
5/2/2013 Defendant Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Request for Judicial Notice of Legislative History of California Penal Code Sections 26350 and 26400
5/2/2013 Defendant Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
5/2/2013 Defendant Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/2/2013 Defendant Defendant California Attorney Genearl Kamala D. Harris’s Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/30/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion By Defendant City of Redondo Beach to Dismiss The Second and Third Claims In the Second Amended Complaint
4/19/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 89 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 15, 2013, Defendant City of Redondo Beach filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 89 ). Plaintiff shall have until May 3, 2013 to file and serve an Opposition to the Motion. Defendant shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to file and serve a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for May 21, 2013 be taken off calendar. (See document for further details).
4/19/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. No. 85 ). Plaintiff set May 20, 2013 as the hearing date on the Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the hearing date of May 20, 2013 is VACATED and no appearance is necessary, unless otherwise advised by the Court.
4/18/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants’ Opposition, if any, is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, i.e., by May 2, 2013. Plaintiff’s Reply is due seven (7) days from the date of service of the Opposition.
4/16/2013 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Answer to Plaintiff Charles Nichol’s Second Amended Complaint
4/15/2013 Defendant Defendant Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendant City of Redondo Beach’s Motion to Dismiss Second and Third Claims in Second Amended Complaint, or, In The Alternative, In Support of Motion for More Definite Statement
4/15/2013 Defendant Defendant Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Second & Third Claims in Second Amended Complaint or, In The Alternative For More Definite Statement
4/10/2013 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013 Plaintiff Declaration of Charles Nichols In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for A Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013 Plaintiff Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/2/2013 Court MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. No. 83 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 1, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Second Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants shall file a response to the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
3/29/2013 Plaintiff Second Amended Complaint
3/3/2013 Court Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
2/28/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Jones 54 Cal. 4th 350
2/25/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority Re Peterson v. Martinez Case No. 11-1149
1/11/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Related Case re McKay v. Sheriff Hutchens
1/11/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re Moore v. Shepard and Moore v. Madigan
1/11/2013 Plaintiff Notice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Mitchell
12/21/2012 Court Order on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney
12/20/2012 Plaintiff Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney
12/20/2012 Court Notice of Document Discrepancies re Substitution of Attorney
12/17/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Objection to November 20, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
12/4/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’ Objections to November 20, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
11/20/2012 Court Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
11/20/2012 Court Notice of Filing of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
7/23/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Charles Nichols
7/20/2012 Defendant Redondo Beach Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections and Motion to Strike Portions of Nichols Declaration Filed In Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
7/20/2012 Defendant Redondo Beach Defendants’ Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
7/16/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice Filed In Opposition to Defendants Motions to Dismiss
7/16/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Action Filed By Kamala D. Harris Memorandum of Points and Authorities
7/16/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement Filed By Defendants City of Redondo Beach Etc
7/13/2012 Court ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting 62 Request to Substitute Attorney
7/12/2012 Plaintiff REQUEST to Substitute attorney Michael F. Sisson in place of attorney Charles Nichols filed by Attorney Charles Nichols. Request set for hearing on 7/13/2012 at 01:30 PM before Judge S. James Otero
7/5/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On June 29, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi, Todd Heywood and California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until July 16, 2012 to serve and file Oppositions to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Oppositions to serve and file Replies, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for July 31, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for details
7/2/2012 Plaintiff PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION to substitution of attorney 53 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols.
7/2/2012 Court ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting 53 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Michael W Webb terminated
6/29/2012 Defendant Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)((1)
6/29/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala Harris’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12
6/29/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala Harris Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action
6/29/2012 Defendant Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012 Defendant Defendants Redondo Beach Declaration of Lisa Bond In Support of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012 Defendant Defendants Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012 Defendant Defendants Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/28/2012 Defendant REQUEST to Substitute attorney Lisa Bond in place of attorney Michael W. Webb filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi.
6/27/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; the Court extends the deadline by one day and ORDERS Harris, Leonardi and City of Redondo Beach to file a response to the First Amended Complaint by Friday, June 29, 2012. See order for further details
6/19/2012 Plaintiff Proof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach
6/19/2012 Plaintiff Proof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach Police Officer Todd Heywood
6/19/2012 Plaintiff Proof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach Police Chief Joseph Leonardi
6/19/2012 Plaintiff Proof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
5/30/2012 Court 60 DAY AMENDED Summons Issued re Amended Complaint 47 as to defendant City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Kamala D Harris (Attorney General in her official capacity as Attorney General of California), Officer Todd Heywood
5/30/2012 Plaintiff First Amended Complaint
5/7/2012 Court Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
5/7/2012 Court MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)by Judge S. James Otero: The Court deems the Plaintiff’s MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation 41 as an objection. Accordingly, the Court takes the hearing off its calendar
5/2/2012 Plaintiff NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. correcting MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation re Report and Recommendation
5/1/2012 Defendant Response of Defendants Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. and Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Objections to Chief Mag. Judge Suzanne H. Segal’s Report and Recommendation
4/17/2012 Plaintiff Proposed Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
4/17/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of His Motion to Review Report and Recommendation Filed By Honorable Suzanne H. Segal, U.S. Magistrate Judge
4/17/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
4/5/2012 Court Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
4/5/2012 Court Notice of Filing of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
3/19/2012 Defendant Reply of California Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
3/12/2012 Plaintiff Declaration of Charles Nichols In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Edmund G. Brown
3/12/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Defendant Edmund G. Brown, Jr., In His Official Capacity as Governor of California
3/9/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re: MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 34. On March 8, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, a Motion to Dismiss was filed by Defendant Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Plaintiff shall have until March 23, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motion. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for April 10, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for further details
3/8/2012 Defendant Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
3/8/2012 Defendant Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismis Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
2/24/2012 Plaintiff PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols, Complaint – (Referred) 1, Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) 3 served on 02/16/12
2/21/2012 Plaintiff Reply to Order Directing Plaintiff to File Response Regarding Application for Entry of Default
2/17/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: DENYING THE REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR A HEARING (Dkt. Nos. 25-26); See minute order for details
2/16/2012 Plaintiff NOTICE of Error in Submission of Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Brown filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/16/2012 Plaintiff NOTICE of Error in Submission of Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Brown filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/15/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: the Court directs Plaintiff to file a response within seven (7) days (February 22, 2012) of the date of this Order stating whether he wishes to withdraw his Application. See minute order for further details
2/14/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Reply Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint of Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/14/2012 Defendant Redondo Beach Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
2/14/2012 Defendant Objections to Plaintiff’s Notice of Lodging
2/14/2012 Defendant Redondo Beach Defendants’ Objections to Plaintiff’s Two Requests for Judicial Notice; Request for Hearing
2/13/2012 Plaintiff Application for Entry of Default Opposition re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr 22 filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr.
2/10/2012 Plaintiff Request for Judicial Notice of Recently Decided 9th Circuit Opinion In Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motions to Dismiss by Redondo Beach Defedants and Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General
2/8/2012 Plaintiff APPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/8/2012 Plaintiff Declaration of Charles Nichols
2/8/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Notice of Lodging of Computer Disc Containing Videos Referenced as Exhibit 1-1 to 1-4 In Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants
2/8/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants
2/8/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Defendant Kamala Harris Motion to Dismiss
2/8/2012 Plaintiff Request for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants and Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General In Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of California
2/2/2012 Plaintiff CONSENT TO PROCEED before a U. S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), consent is hereby DECLINED by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/1/2012 Defendant Notice of Errata In Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/31/2012 Court MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: re: MOTION to Dismiss Case 12 and MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 13. On January 30, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach and City of Redondo Beach Police Department and by Defendant Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until February 14, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for March 6, 2012 be taken off calendar
1/30/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala Harris Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/30/2012 Defendant Defendant Kamala Harris Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/30/2012 Defendant Defendant Redondo Beach Proposed Order to Motion to Dismiss
1/30/2012 Defendant Defendant Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
1/30/2012 Defendant Defendant’s Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss
1/19/2012  Court MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: denying 10 Ex Parte Application to Seal; Plaintiffs Application is DENIED. Plaintiff fails to explain his purpose in filing the Report or provide any compelling reason that would justify filing the Report under seal. There is no pending motion and Defendants have not yet answered the Complaint. Furthermore, the Application fails to comply with the Local Rules governing ex parte applications. See minute order for further details.
1/17/2012 Plaintiff Plaintiff’s ExParte Application to Submit Document Under Seal and Request for Waiver of Notice and Memorandum
12/7/2011 Court Standing Order Governing Pre-Trial Proceedings Before The Magistrate Judge
11/30/2011 Plaintiff NOTICE OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal
11/30/2011 Plaintiff CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
11/30/2011 Plaintiff Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief