Nichols v. Brown et al.

Court of Appeals Docket #: 14-55873 Docketed: 05/29/2014
Nature of Suit: 3440 Other Civil Rights
Appeal From: U.S. District Court for Central California, Los Angeles

Originating Court Information:
District: 0973-2 : 2:11-cv-09916-SJO-SS
Trial Judge: S. James Otero, District Judge
Date Filed: 11/30/2011

DateFiling PartyDocument
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
7/22/2016CourtOrder Granting Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Further Stay Appellate Proceedings
7/17/2016AppellantStatus Report
7/17/2016AppellantUnopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 and Richards
4/5/2016CourtOrder Granting Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Further Stay Appellate Proceedings
3/17/2016AppellantStatus Report
3/17/2016AppellantUnopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 and Richards
2/4/2016CourtOrder Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
1/20/2016AppellantStatus Report
1/20/2016AppellantUnopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
11/9/2015CourtOrder Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
10/8/2015AppellantStatus Report
10/8/2015AppellantUnopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
7/21/2015CourtOrder Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
7/17/2015AppellantStatus Report
7/17/2015AppellantUnopposed Motion to Extend Stay Pending This Court’s En Banc Resolution of Peruta v. County of San Diego
4/13/2015CourtOrder Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Until June 30, 2015
4/9/2015 Appellee Unopposed Motion to Extend Stay Until June 30, 2015
1/21/2015CourtFiled order (Appellate Commissioner):Appellants motion to file sur-reply in opposition to appellees motion to stay proceedings is granted. Appellants sur-reply and the previously submitted filings concerning the motion to stay proceedings have been considered. Appellees opposed motion to stay proceedings pending the courts ruling whether to grant the petition for en banc review in Richards v. Prieto, No. 11-16255 is granted. Within 90 days after the date of this order or within 14 days after the court rules on the petition for en banc review in Richards, whichever occurs first, appellees shall file an appropriate motion addressing the status of this appeal and requesting a further stay or other relief. Appellants motion to file an oversized opening brief is granted in part. Appellant may file an opening brief that does not exceed 18,000 words. The opening brief is due within 14 days after the stay granted in the preceding paragraph (or any subsequent stay) expires. Appellants unopposed motion for an extension to file a shortened opening brief is granted. The answering brief is due within 45 days after the stay expires. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief.
12/24/2014CourtStreamlined request [9] by Appellees Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Kamala D. Harris to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 32-2.[9362274] (GS) [Entered: 12/24/2014 04:17 PM]
12/24/2014AppelleeFiled (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees Kamala D. Harris and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.. New requested due date is 01/30/2015. [9361612] [14-55873] (JME) [Entered: 12/24/2014 11:24 AM]
12/15/2014AppellantAppellant’s Sur-Reply In Opposition to Appellee’s Motion to Stay Proceedings
12/15/2014AppellantAppellant’s Motion to File Sur-Reply In Opposition to Defendant-Appellee Kamala Harris’ Motion to Stay Proceedings
12/8/2014AppelleeReply In Support of Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
12/1/2014AppellantAppellant’s Motion to Exceed Type Volume Limitation to Opening Brief Declaration of Charles Nicols
12/1/2014AppellantAppellant’s Addendum to Opening Brief Addendum
12/1/2014AppellantAppellant’s Opening Brief Addendum Certificate of Service
11/29/2014AppellantAppellant’s Opposition to Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
11/23/2014AppellantAppellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief; Declaration of Charles Nichols
11/19/2014AppelleeAppellees Motion for 90-Day Stay of Proceedings
10/16/2014CourtOrder Granting Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief
5/29/2014CourtCourt of Appeal Time Schedule Order
5/27/2014AppellantNotice of Appeal
5/1/2014CourtJudgment
5/1/2014CourtOrder Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
4/14/2014DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’s Response to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Objection to U.S. Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation
4/11/2014CourtNotice of Discrepancy and Order
3/31/2014PlaintiffPlaintiff Nichols’ Objection and Opposition to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
3/18/2014CourtReport and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
3/18/2014CourtNOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2014. (mr) (Entered: 03/18/2014)
2/5/2014PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re US v. Cureton No. 12-1250 & 12-1251
2/5/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority
2/3/2014PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Response to Defendant Harris’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority [Dkt #157]
1/28/2014DefendantFurther Objections to Supplemental Filings
1/13/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Re Notice of Supplemental Authority re Morris v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1/13/2014PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re Morris v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
1/10/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Re Notice of Supplemental Authority re Illinois Association of Firearm Retailers v. City of Chicago
1/10/2014PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re Benson v. City of Chicago
1/6/2014PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority re Patel v. City of Los Angeles
1/6/2014PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Response to Defendant Harris’ Objection to Plaintiff’s Notice of Supplemental Authority [Dkt #149]
1/6/2014PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re Patel v. City of Los Angeles
12/27/2013DefendantObjection to Supplemental Filing
12/13/2013PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols re Notice of Supplemental Authority
12/13/2013PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re Sylvester v. Harris
12/9/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Charles Nichols’ Objection to Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes [Dkt #140 -2]
12/9/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Charles Nichols’ Objection to Defendant Harris’ Errata Filing(s)
12/9/2013DefendantPlaintiff Charles Nichols’ Reply to Defendant Harris’ Statement of Genuine Disputes [Dkt #140-1]
12/9/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Charles Nichols Reply to Defendant Harris’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt #140]
12/3/2013DefendantReply In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12
12/3/2013DefendantCorrected Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
12/3/2013DefendantNotice of Errata to Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
12/2/2013DefendantStatement of Genuine Disputes
12/2/2013DefendantDeclaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes
12/2/2013DefendantMemorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/26/2013DefendantDeclaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg Regarding Statement of Genuine Disputes
11/26/2013DefendantStatement of Genuine Disputes
11/26/2013DefendantMemorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/26/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
11/26/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Nichols Objection to Evidence
11/18/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, On November 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which was entered on the Courts docket on November 15, 2013. (Dkt. No. 131). The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Defendants Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment 131 .
11/13/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: (1) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND (2) VACATING HEARING DATE (Dkt. No. 129 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Defendant’s Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. If Plaintiff does not intend to oppose the Motion, he may request a voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). A Notice of Dismissal form is attached for Plaintiff’s convenience. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal Form)
11/12/2013DefendantRequest for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
11/12/2013DefendantMemoradum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed R. Civ. P. 12
11/12/2013DefendantNotice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(C)
11/8/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Nichols’ Notice of Lodging of Proposed Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; Evidence In Support
11/8/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff Nichols’ Notice of Lodging of Proposed Order
11/8/2013PlaintiffExhibits A Through H In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013PlaintiffDeclaration of Plaintiff Charles Nichols In Support of His Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013PlaintiffMemorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
11/8/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
10/15/2013CourtNichols v. Brown_Order Staying Appeal Pending Richards, Peruta & Baker
10/3/2013CourtReceived original and 7 copies reply brief of Appellant Charles Nichols (Informal: No) 37 pages. Served on 09/17/2013. Major deficiencies: brief is oversize. Notified appellant.
10/3/2013AppellantAppellant’s Motion to File Oversize Reply Brief
9/25/2013CourtPlaintiff-Appellant Nichols’ Reply to Motion of CRPA Foundation for Leave to File Amicus Brief and to Participate In Oral Argument
9/25/2013 CourtOrder Referring CRPA Foundation’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief to Merits Panel
9/23/2013 RespondentResponse of Kamala Harris to Motion of CRPA Foundation for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and to Participate in Oral Argument 
9/12/2013 CourtOrder re Supplemental Excerpts of Record 
9/12/2013 CourtFiled Appellee Kamala D. Harris paper copies of excerpts of record [17] in 3 volume(s). [8780157] (WP)
9/12/2013 Appellant Supplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 3 
9/12/2013 AppellantSupplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 2
9/12/2013 AppellantSupplemental Excerpts of Record, Volume 1
9/11/2013 AmiciMotion of CRPA Foundation For Leave of Court to File Amicus Curiae Brief and To Participate In Oral Argument
9/11/2013CourtCOURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Refiled using correct ECF event. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [20]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) California Rifle & Pistol Association Foundation Motion to become amicus curiae. Date of service: 09/11/2013. [8778925] (CDM)
9/9/2013 CourtReceived 7 paper copies of Answering brief [13] filed by Kamala D. Harris. [8776535] (SD)
9/5/2013 CourtOrder re Answering Brief 
9/4/2013Appellant Brief of Respondent California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
9/4/2013Appellant Appellant’s Reply Brief
8/15/2013CourtOrder Granting CRPA Foundation’s Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief
8/7/2013CourtEntered appearance of Amicus Curiae – Pending CRPA Foundation. [8735109] (EL)
8/7/2013Amicus Curiae CRPAProposed Amicus Curiae’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief
8/7/2013AppellantNotice of Entitlement to Priority Hearing
8/6/2013PlaintiffNichols’ Opening Brief
8/2/2013CourtNinth Circuit Order Denying Motion to Expedite Preliminary Injunction Appeal
7/29/2013DefendantDefendant Kamala Harris’s Case Status Report
7/18/2013CourtOrder Denying Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/16/2013DefendantOpposition of Defendant City of RB to Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Memorandum, Reasons and Points of Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013PlaintiffNotice of Lodging of Proposed Order Staying Further District Court Proceedings
7/12/2013PlaintiffEx Parte Application for Stay Pending Appeal
7/12/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Potential Mootness Against City of Redondo Beach
7/10/2013CourtCourt of Appeal briefing schedule
7/9/2013CourtNotification by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13-56203 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
7/8/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Appeal Re Preliminary Injunction
7/3/2013CourtOrder Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
6/12/2013CourtScheduling Order
6/3/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice and Reply to Defendant Kamala Harris’s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
6/3/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Reply to Kamala Harris’s Opposition to Charles Nichols’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/28/2013DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’ Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/16/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Reply to Defendant City of Redondo Beach’s Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Declaration Submitted In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
5/16/2013CourtMinute Order Striking Defendants Opposition and Plaintiffs Reply
5/7/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice and Reply to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
5/7/2013PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Reply to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichol’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/7/2013DefendantDefendant City of Redondo Beach’s Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff’s Declaration Submitted In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
5/7/2013DefendantDefendant City of Redondo Beach Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion to Dismiss Second and Third Claims In The Second Amended Complaint; Declaration of T. Peter Pierce In Support
5/7/2013DefendantDefendant City of Redondo Beach Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss The Second and Third Claims In The Second Amended Complaint
5/2/2013DefendantDefendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Request for Judicial Notice of Legislative History of California Penal Code Sections 26350 and 26400
5/2/2013DefendantDefendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Charles Nichols
5/2/2013DefendantDefendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg In Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
5/2/2013DefendantDefendant California Attorney Genearl Kamala D. Harris’s Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/30/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Opposition to Motion By Defendant City of Redondo Beach to Dismiss The Second and Third Claims In the Second Amended Complaint
4/19/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. 89 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 15, 2013, Defendant City of Redondo Beach filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 89 ). Plaintiff shall have until May 3, 2013 to file and serve an Opposition to the Motion. Defendant shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to file and serve a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for May 21, 2013 be taken off calendar. (See document for further details).
4/19/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. No. 85 ). Plaintiff set May 20, 2013 as the hearing date on the Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the hearing date of May 20, 2013 is VACATED and no appearance is necessary, unless otherwise advised by the Court.
4/18/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants’ Opposition, if any, is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, i.e., by May 2, 2013. Plaintiff’s Reply is due seven (7) days from the date of service of the Opposition.
4/16/2013DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’s Answer to Plaintiff Charles Nichol’s Second Amended Complaint
4/15/2013DefendantDefendant Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendant City of Redondo Beach’s Motion to Dismiss Second and Third Claims in Second Amended Complaint, or, In The Alternative, In Support of Motion for More Definite Statement
4/15/2013DefendantDefendant Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Second & Third Claims in Second Amended Complaint or, In The Alternative For More Definite Statement
4/10/2013PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013PlaintiffDeclaration of Charles Nichols In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for A Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013PlaintiffMemorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/10/2013PlaintiffNotice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction
4/2/2013CourtMINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. No. 83 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 1, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Second Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants shall file a response to the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
3/29/2013PlaintiffSecond Amended Complaint
3/3/2013CourtOrder Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
2/28/2013PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Jones 54 Cal. 4th 350
2/25/2013PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority Re Peterson v. Martinez Case No. 11-1149
1/11/2013PlaintiffNotice of Related Case re McKay v. Sheriff Hutchens
1/11/2013PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re Moore v. Shepard and Moore v. Madigan
1/11/2013PlaintiffNotice of Supplemental Authority re People v. Mitchell
12/21/2012CourtOrder on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney
12/20/2012PlaintiffRequest for Approval of Substitution of Attorney
12/20/2012CourtNotice of Document Discrepancies re Substitution of Attorney
12/17/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Response to Defendant Kamala D. Harris’s Objection to November 20, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
12/4/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’ Objections to November 20, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
11/20/2012CourtReport and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
11/20/2012CourtNotice of Filing of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
7/23/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’s Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Charles Nichols
7/20/2012DefendantRedondo Beach Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections and Motion to Strike Portions of Nichols Declaration Filed In Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
7/20/2012DefendantRedondo Beach Defendants’ Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
7/16/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice Filed In Opposition to Defendants Motions to Dismiss
7/16/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Action Filed By Kamala D. Harris Memorandum of Points and Authorities
7/16/2012PlaintiffPlaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement Filed By Defendants City of Redondo Beach Etc
7/13/2012CourtORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting 62 Request to Substitute Attorney
7/12/2012PlaintiffREQUEST to Substitute attorney Michael F. Sisson in place of attorney Charles Nichols filed by Attorney Charles Nichols. Request set for hearing on 7/13/2012 at 01:30 PM before Judge S. James Otero
7/5/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On June 29, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi, Todd Heywood and California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until July 16, 2012 to serve and file Oppositions to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Oppositions to serve and file Replies, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for July 31, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for details
7/2/2012PlaintiffPLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION to substitution of attorney 53 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols.
7/2/2012CourtORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting 53 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Michael W Webb terminated
6/29/2012DefendantRequest for Judicial Notice In Support of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)((1)
6/29/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala Harris’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12
6/29/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala Harris Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action
6/29/2012DefendantProposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012DefendantDefendants Redondo Beach Declaration of Lisa Bond In Support of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012DefendantDefendants Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/29/2012DefendantDefendants Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative Motion for More Definite Statement
6/28/2012DefendantREQUEST to Substitute attorney Lisa Bond in place of attorney Michael W. Webb filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi.
6/27/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; the Court extends the deadline by one day and ORDERS Harris, Leonardi and City of Redondo Beach to file a response to the First Amended Complaint by Friday, June 29, 2012. See order for further details
6/19/2012PlaintiffProof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach
6/19/2012PlaintiffProof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach Police Officer Todd Heywood
6/19/2012PlaintiffProof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on City of Redondo Beach Police Chief Joseph Leonardi
6/19/2012PlaintiffProof of Service for First Amended Summons and Complaint served on California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
5/30/2012Court60 DAY AMENDED Summons Issued re Amended Complaint 47 as to defendant City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Kamala D Harris (Attorney General in her official capacity as Attorney General of California), Officer Todd Heywood
5/30/2012PlaintiffFirst Amended Complaint
5/7/2012CourtOrder Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge
5/7/2012CourtMINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)by Judge S. James Otero: The Court deems the Plaintiff’s MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation 41 as an objection. Accordingly, the Court takes the hearing off its calendar
5/2/2012PlaintiffNOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. correcting MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation re Report and Recommendation
5/1/2012DefendantResponse of Defendants Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. and Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris to Plaintiff Charles Nichols’s Objections to Chief Mag. Judge Suzanne H. Segal’s Report and Recommendation
4/17/2012PlaintiffProposed Order Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
4/17/2012PlaintiffPlaintiffs Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of His Motion to Review Report and Recommendation Filed By Honorable Suzanne H. Segal, U.S. Magistrate Judge
4/17/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
4/5/2012CourtReport and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
4/5/2012CourtNotice of Filing of Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
3/19/2012DefendantReply of California Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
3/12/2012PlaintiffDeclaration of Charles Nichols In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss by Edmund G. Brown
3/12/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Defendant Edmund G. Brown, Jr., In His Official Capacity as Governor of California
3/9/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re: MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 34. On March 8, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, a Motion to Dismiss was filed by Defendant Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Plaintiff shall have until March 23, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motion. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for April 10, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for further details
3/8/2012DefendantMemorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
3/8/2012DefendantGov. Edmund G. Brown Jr.’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismis Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
2/24/2012PlaintiffPROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols, Complaint – (Referred) 1, Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) 3 served on 02/16/12
2/21/2012PlaintiffReply to Order Directing Plaintiff to File Response Regarding Application for Entry of Default
2/17/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: DENYING THE REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR A HEARING (Dkt. Nos. 25-26); See minute order for details
2/16/2012PlaintiffNOTICE of Error in Submission of Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Brown filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/16/2012PlaintiffNOTICE of Error in Submission of Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Brown filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/15/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: the Court directs Plaintiff to file a response within seven (7) days (February 22, 2012) of the date of this Order stating whether he wishes to withdraw his Application. See minute order for further details
2/14/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala D. Harris’s Reply Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint of Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/14/2012DefendantRedondo Beach Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
2/14/2012DefendantObjections to Plaintiff’s Notice of Lodging
2/14/2012DefendantRedondo Beach Defendants’ Objections to Plaintiff’s Two Requests for Judicial Notice; Request for Hearing
2/13/2012PlaintiffApplication for Entry of Default Opposition re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr 22 filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr.
2/10/2012PlaintiffRequest for Judicial Notice of Recently Decided 9th Circuit Opinion In Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motions to Dismiss by Redondo Beach Defedants and Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General
2/8/2012PlaintiffAPPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/8/2012PlaintiffDeclaration of Charles Nichols
2/8/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Notice of Lodging of Computer Disc Containing Videos Referenced as Exhibit 1-1 to 1-4 In Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants
2/8/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants
2/8/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Defendant Kamala Harris Motion to Dismiss
2/8/2012PlaintiffRequest for Judicial Notice In Opposition to Motion to Dismiss By Redondo Beach Defendants and Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General In Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of California
2/2/2012PlaintiffCONSENT TO PROCEED before a U. S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), consent is hereby DECLINED by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
2/1/2012DefendantNotice of Errata In Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/31/2012CourtMINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: re: MOTION to Dismiss Case 12 and MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 13. On January 30, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach and City of Redondo Beach Police Department and by Defendant Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until February 14, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for March 6, 2012 be taken off calendar
1/30/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala Harris Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/30/2012DefendantDefendant Kamala Harris Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Action Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1)
1/30/2012DefendantDefendant Redondo Beach Proposed Order to Motion to Dismiss
1/30/2012DefendantDefendant Redondo Beach Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
1/30/2012DefendantDefendant’s Redondo Beach Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss
1/19/2012 CourtMINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: denying 10 Ex Parte Application to Seal; Plaintiffs Application is DENIED. Plaintiff fails to explain his purpose in filing the Report or provide any compelling reason that would justify filing the Report under seal. There is no pending motion and Defendants have not yet answered the Complaint. Furthermore, the Application fails to comply with the Local Rules governing ex parte applications. See minute order for further details.
1/17/2012PlaintiffPlaintiff’s ExParte Application to Submit Document Under Seal and Request for Waiver of Notice and Memorandum
12/7/2011CourtStanding Order Governing Pre-Trial Proceedings Before The Magistrate Judge
11/30/2011PlaintiffNOTICE OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal
11/30/2011PlaintiffCERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols
11/30/2011PlaintiffComplaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief